Tuesday, April 13, 2010

The "Good" War

  • "The Taliban reportedly banned these practices when it was in power," says Kelley B. Vlahos of an issue that "has put us in a moral and ethical quandary too painful and perhaps too shameful to contemplate more openly" — The Rape of the Afghan Boys. She quotes Patrtrick Cockburn as reporting that "one reason Afghan villagers prefer to deal with the Taliban rather than the government security forces is that the latter have a habit of seizing their sons at checkpoints and sodomizing them." She asks, "Does it turn your stomach to think that American money went to train the police who now stand shoulder-to-shoulder each night with Afghan men gaping at underage boys dancing in silk with bells on their feet?"

  • Gareth Porter argues that "after eight years of operating there, the U.S. military still has no understanding of the personal, tribal, and other local sociopolitical conflicts" — Ignorance of Afghan Society Led to Botched Raids. "I don’t want to say we’re clueless, but we are," he quotes Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal's chief of intelligence, Gen. Michael Flynn, as saying. "We’re no more than fingernail deep in our understanding the environment."

  • "Activists behind a website dedicated to revealing secret documents have complained of harassment by police and intelligence services as they prepare to release a video showing an American attack in which 97 civilians were killed in Afghanistan," reports Matthew Campbell — Whistleblowers on US 'Massacre' Fear CIA Stalkers.
  • Labels: , , , , ,

    Bookmark and Share

    6 Comments:

    Blogger Robert said...

    She quotes Patrtrick Cockburn as reporting that "one reason Afghan villagers prefer to deal with the Taliban rather than the government security forces is that the latter have a habit of seizing their sons at checkpoints and sodomizing them." She asks, "Does it turn your stomach to think that American money went to train the police who now stand shoulder-to-shoulder each night with Afghan men gaping at underage boys dancing in silk with bells on their feet?"

    Christ, who's running the war over there? Cardinal Ratzinger?

    6:29 PM  
    Blogger The Western Confucian said...

    No, President Obama's running the war over there, so don't expect anyone in the mainstream "liberal" or "conservative" press to say anything about it.

    Besides, it's much easier for "investigative journalists" to rehash old stories from the '70s and '80s (decades before Ratzinger's CDF took over management of the gay priest crisis), rather than report on something that's actually happening now, with American taxpayers footing the bill.

    9:14 PM  
    Blogger Stephen said...

    Especially when you consider that said "investigative journalists" have a vested interest in undermining the Catholic Church, which stands nearly alone in resisting their relativistic agenda. They have no such interest in undermining the One.

    10:41 PM  
    Blogger David Lindsay said...

    The Pope is certainly not fighting a war in order to make it possible for men to have sex with boys.

    7:46 AM  
    Blogger The Western Confucian said...

    He's not, and it seems we are. As Ms. Vlahos notes, "They are the meekest, preyed upon by the strongest – the kind of wealthy, powerful men who have benefited most from the Western occupation and generous foreign aid."

    10:10 AM  
    Blogger The Western Confucian said...

    Of course, the Pope's been fighting a war in order to make it impossible for men to have sex with boys, but the media prefers not to cover that.

    10:25 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Links to this post:

    Create a Link

    << Home

    Omnes Sancti et Sanctæ Coreæ, orate pro nobis.