North Korean Aid Demands

Mr. Sam Kim describes them in Relief goods mirror plight of stunted N. Koreans:

Thousands of used but clean shirts, pants and other clothes are stacked in big heaps in warehouses outside Seoul to be sent to poverty-stricken North Korea.

But they can't be sent as they are, because North Korean officials want to get them their way: all without English writing on them and their size no bigger than "large."

"In addition, we have color restrictions," Ahn Jeong-hui, director of the Korean Council for Reconciliation and Cooperation, the donor of the clothes and other relief goods. "Strong colors could easily repulse North Koreans."

[....]

After years of dealing with North Korea, South Korean donors have learned that helping the communist country is not just about sending large quantities of supplies. It requires certain "customization,"

"The maximum size of clothes we send to North Korea is 'large,'" said Hyun Il-hyun, secretary at Join Together Society, another South Korean relief agency, "We know anything bigger, like 'extra large' or 'extra extra large,' won't fit North Koreans."

"What will fit elementary school kids in South Korea will usually fit North Korean middle-schoolers," she said. "Most North Korean adults will fit well into what South Korean teenagers wear."

Chronic food shortages and malnutrition have stunted many North Koreans, making some look like dwarfs. Television footage broadcast in South Korea showed gaunt North Koreans scouring winter fields for grains left by reapers.

[....]

A 2004 survey of 2,300 North Korean defectors showed that average North Korean men and women are 5.9 centimeter and 4.1 centimeters shorter than their South Korean counterparts, respectively. An average 14-year-old boy from North Korea is up to 15.8 centimeters shorter than the same-aged South Korean.

English-embellished clothes are not welcome, either, in North Korea, relief workers said.

"We pick out any clothing that has English writing on it," Hyun of Join Together Society said. "North Korean authorities apparently don't want their people to think the clothes are coming from their sworn enemy, the U.S. We also restrict clothes that have the names of South Korean organizations."

Inside North Korea's Potemkin Church

British diplomat James Mawdsley describes a visit to North Korea's only Catholic chuch in The Walled Country: Truth and Lies in North Korea. There were no priests, no Eucharist, and, perhaps most tellingly, no children.

The lack of children is surer sign than the lack of priests and the Eucharist that this was no Catholic church. The Church can survive without priests and the Eucharist, as the Catholic Church did in Korea for several decades, if not centuries, before the 1830s. Mr. Mawdsley gives this brief history of the Korean Church:

We left more than 50 rosaries, as well as prayer cards from Aid to the Church in Need and booklets titled Martyrs of Korea, hoping they’d be distributed. The booklets told of the growth of the Church in Korea—the only Catholic Church to have been established by lay believers. When French priests arrived in disguise in the 1830s, there was already a flock of thousands, despite frequent persecution. The message of Christ resonated in a culture that had heard since 450 b.c. that “those who follow the will of God know only love for all mankind, and seek by love to benefit others” (Mo-Tzu).

In Martyrs of Korea, Rev. Richard Rutt describes the ordeals faced by those incarcerated for their faith: “A cord was passed under the thighs, crossed over the front then held taut by men on either side who applied a sawing motion that cut through the flesh like a cheese-cutter, right to the bone.” Prisoners were given boiled millet twice a day. Those who could not buy or acquire more food were reduced to eating the straw and lice. Many recanted their faith. Others were faithful to the end, including Korea’s first priest, St. Andrew Kim, beheaded with eight strokes of a sword on the flat sands of the Han River in 1846. Pope John Paul II visited those same Han sands in 1984 to perform the first canonization outside Rome. Forty-seven Korean women were recognized as saints, as were 46 Korean men, seven French priests, and three French bishops.

And yet the persecution of the 1800s doesn’t compare to the annihilation that came under Kim Il Sung.

The rest of the article goes on to describe that annihilation. It is not an easy read.

The Church of Silence survives, though, and the article describes a rural area where "every Sunday a few believers gathered to pray at the ruins of a Catholic church that had been bombed during the Korean War."

[link sent by Mr. Jason Choi of KoreanCatholic]

Fertility

Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse calls it The Real Third Rail in Politics, noting that "[n]o one wants to mention that the insolvency of the Social Security system is a fertility crisis at least as much as a fiscal crisis."

From the article:

The Social Security of the 1930s took for granted women’s contribution of raising productive adult children. That assumption has foundered in recent decades -- possibly due in part to the incentives of Social Security itself. Economists Isaac Ehrlich and Jian-Guo Zhong found that countries with generous social security systems have lower fertility rates, marriage rates and higher divorce rates.

Welfare Statism is self-destructive as it violates The Principle of Subsidiarity, by which "nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization." Let the Family, the basic unit of society, take care of itself and it will prosper.

Quiet Eugenics

Fr. Tadeusz Pacholczyk examines the "conspiracy of eugenics" in which up to 95% of unborn children with conditions like Cystic Fibrosis and Down's Syndrome are aborted: Prenatal testing: Powerful tools raise serious concerns.

Gypsies and the Holocaust

As a Romany quadroon, I am always interested in stories like this one, History Claims Her Artwork, but She Wants It Back*, about a young woman in Auschwitz forced by Josef Mengele, The Angel Of Death, to paint the watercolors pictured below:


Her paintings are housed in the museum in Oświęcim (Osvyenchim in Romani). It's a tough case, but I say she deserves her paintings back.

Here are some links that provide some background: Gypsies in the Holocaust; The Plight of Czech Gypsies in the Holocaust and Today; Brutality At The Hands Of The Monster - Dr Mengele.

As an aside, one thing I've never understood is why Holocaust Denial is prevalent among Schismatic Traditionalists. Why those who claim to uphold Traditionalism would, against such an overwhelming preponderance of evidence, attempt to cast doubt on Exhibit A in the Prosecution's case against Modernism is beyond me.

*Use BugMeNot.com to bypass registration.

The Superior Man (君子)

That refreshingly anti-egalitarian term found in the writing of Confucius is analyzed by Thomas Merton in this quote taken from an excellent essay entitled Merton and Confucius:

The philosophy of Confucius aims at developing the person in such a way that he is a superior person. But what do you mean "superior"? It's not that he is a superman or any of this kind of nonsense, and it is not at all that he stands out over other people by winning .... Confucius doesn't have a philosophy on how to be a winner ... In contrast, the superior man in Confucius is the self‑sacrificing man, the man who is formed in such a way that he knows how to give himself..., that in giving himself, he realizes himself. This is what Confucius discovered, and this is a great discovery.... This is just as fundamental as anything can be.

Some quotes on the above from Confucius - Wikiquote:

學而時習之，不亦說乎？有朋自遠方來，不亦樂乎？人不知而不慍，不亦君子乎？
Isn't it a pleasure to study and practice what you have learned? Isn't it also great when friends visit from distant places? If people do not recognize me and it doesn't bother me, am I not a Superior Man?

君子不重，則不威；學則不固。主忠信。无友不如己者。國，則勿憚改。
If the Superior Man is not serious, then he will not inspire awe in others. If he is not learned, then he will not be on firm ground. He takes loyalty and good faith to be of primary importance, and has no friends who are not of equal (moral) caliber. When he makes a mistake, he doesn't hesitate to correct it.

君子食无求飽，居无求安，敏於事而慎於言，就有道而正焉，可謂好學也已。
When the Superior Man eats he does not try to stuff himself; at rest he does not seek perfect comfort; he is diligent in his work and careful in speech. He avails himself to people of the Tao and thereby corrects himself. This is the kind of person of whom you can say, 'he loves learning.'

君子周而不比，小人比而不周。
The Superior Man is all-embracing and not partial. The inferior man is partial and not all-embracing.

君子无所争。必也射乎！揖让而升，下而饮。其争也君子。
The Superior Man has nothing to compete for. But if he must compete, he does it in an archery match, wherein he ascends to his position, bowing in deference. Descending, he drinks the ritual cup. This is the competition of the Superior Man.

君子喻於义，小人喻於利。
The Superior Man is aware of Righteousness, the inferior man is aware of advantage.

君子博学於文，约之以礼，亦可以弗畔矣夫！
The Superior Man, extensively studying all learning, and keeping himself under the restraint of the rules of propriety, may thus likewise not overstep what is right.

君子安而不忘危，存而不忘亡，治而不忘乱。是以身安而国家可保也。
The Superior Man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.

On Study and Thought

學而不思則罔，思而不學則殆。
To study and not think is a waste. To think and not study is dangerous.

[from Confucius - Wikiquote]

Some Facts About Nagasaki

Apparently, posting just the above is enough to ignite a firestorm of controversy, as Mr. Dave Armstrong of Cor ad cor loquitur has done with his post 9000-9600 Catholics Killed at Nagasaki in August 1945.

[link via Built on a Rock]

Evil

This is the type of story the modernist world scoffs at: Hitler and Stalin were possessed by the Devil, says Vatican exorcist.

Here is part of what Father Gabriele Amorth said:

Of course the Devil exists and he can not only possess a single person but also groups and entire populations.

I am convinced that the Nazis were all possessed. All you have to do is think about what Hitler - and Stalin did. Almost certainly they were possessed by the Devil.

You can tell by their behaviour and their actions, from the horrors they committed and the atrocities that were committed on their orders. That's why we need to defend society from demons.

Fr. Amorth also says that Venerable Pope Pius XII, known in some quarters as "Hitler's Pope," attempted a "long-distance exorcism" of the Fuerher.

I am sure that quite a number of Catholics ─ I'm tempted to say neo-Catholics ─ find themselves embarrassed by such a statements about the Devil and demons, or at the very least find such talk not in keeping with The Spirit of Vatican II™. Perhaps these need to be reminded of Charles Baudelaire's famous quote ─ la plus belles ruses du diable est de vous persuader qu'il n'existe pas ─ and of the links between The Nazis And The Occult and The Occult in Russian and Soviet Culture.

Inch'ŏn's "Chinatown"

"How can a town without Chinese people be called a Chinatown?" asks Yuan So-chin in No 'real' Chinatown in S. Korea, the result of xenophobic attitudes.

In many ways, the situation of ethnic Chinese in Korea parallels that of ethnic Koreans in Japan.

The Sage of Mecosta

The great Russell Kirk (1918–1994) was referenced by two of my favorite bloggers today. Mr. Daniel Larison of Eunomia sadly reports that the author of The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot is less likely to get a mention from establishment "conservatives" than the starship captain with whom he shares a surname: “Republicans: Think Like Kirk!” And The Young Fogey of A conservative blog for peace links to a link-laden post by Subdeacon Robert Llizo of Logos on his hero and mine: Real Conservatism: The Legacy of Russell Kirk, Apostle of the "Permanent Things".



[image from Italy's Centro Studi Russell Kirk]

What made Prof. Kirk great, apart from essentially giving "Conservatism" a name and tracing its rich intellectual history? Mr. Jeremy Beer answers that question in his contribution to The American Conservative's What is Left? What is Right? issue:

Here is where Russell Kirk was truly exemplary. He ought to be remembered not as “the principal architect of the postwar conservative movement,” as the quasi-official adulation has it, but because he went home. There he restored an old house, planted trees, and became a justice of the peace; took a wife (and kept her) and had four children; wrote ghost stories about census-takers and other bureaucrats getting it in the neck; took in boatpeople and bums; and denounced every war in which the U.S. became involved—especially the first Gulf War, which he detested. And he also denounced abstractions because he knew they were drugs deployed to distract us from the infinitely more important work of the Brandywine Conservancies of the world.

I've come up with a few Kirkian links of my own to share:

First, perhaps the best place to begin for those unfamiliar with Prof. Kirk would be here: The Kirk Center - Ten Conservative Principles by Russell Kirk.

Second, here is a wonderfully written obituary by personal friend Prof. Marek Jan Chodakiewicz: The Pilgrimage of a Christian Gentleman.

Third, Prof. Jeffrey Hart assesses "the ideas held in balance in the American Conservative Mind today" in The Burke Habit.

Finally, here are some of my own thoughts. It is not only among the Neoconservatives that I find disappointment with those who claim the "Conservative" mantle; among self-described Paleoconservatives, Paleolibertarians, and Traditionalist Conservatives can be found Racialism, Market-worship, anti-Semitism or any number of other loony and unsavory ideas. None of these, however, are found in the thinking of Prof. Kirk, a Liberal in the best sense of the word.

Ancestral Wisdom

Both ancient Greek and Chinese doctors applied the same remedy: Ancient Minty Painkiller Worked, Modern Study Suggests.

War Crimes

From Antiwar.com come two articles on the subject today: Selective Prosecution of War Crimes by Ivan Eland and Bush Goes Retro to Avoid Prosecution by Paul Craig Roberts.

Pax Catholica

Two stories today about Catholic efforts toward peace: the first brokered by an Italian lay apostolate; the second a plan being studied by the Holy See itself.

The Lord's Resistance Army has agreed to lay down its arms: Ugandan ceasefire brokered by St. Egidio community.

Sandro Magister reports that the Vatican is studying a ten-point plan for a comprehensive peace in the Middle East: Fr. Samir: "A Decalogue for Peace in the Middle East".

Spengler on American Music

"No other nation rejects the notion of a high culture with such vehemence, or celebrates the mediocre with such giddiness," writes the Asia Times Online columnist known as Spengler, the thinking man's Evangelical, in American Idolatry.

He offers this history of the degeneration of American popular music:

Frank Sinatra sounded more average than Bing Crosby; Elvis Presley more average than Sinatra; The Beatles more average than Elvis; and Bruce Springsteen (or Madonna) about as average as one can get, until American Idol came along to elevate what was certified to average.

Spengler correctly asserts that Swing "required in essence the same skills as did classical music" and that it was a shame that it was replaced by rock 'n' roll, which he says "drew upon the music of rural resentment, the country and hillbilly music that appealed to failing farmers at county fairs and honky-tonks." Although I disagree with Spengler's rejection of country music, which was ─ it no longer exists as a living tradition ─ simply American folk music, he makes a good point about the "culture of resentment":

The culture of resentment runs so deep in the American character that the self-pitying drone of immiserated farmers, amplified by the petulant adolescents of the 1950s as a remonstration against parental authority, now dominates the musical life of American Christians. Not only Christian country, but Christian rock and Christian heavy metal have become mainstream commercial genre. I agree with the minority of Christians who eschew Christian rock as "the music of the devil", although not for the same reasons: it is immaterial whether Christian rock substitutes "Jesus Christ" for "Peggy Sue", permitting its listeners to associate putatively Christian music with secular music with implied sexual content. It is diabolical because the style itself is born of resentment.

And I could not agree more with Spengler on American Protestantism's finest cultural legacy:

There are American Christians who had no choice but to invent their own music, namely the African-American Church, whose spirituals are gems of rough-hewn beauty. It is no coincidence that black church music maintains the closest ties to classical music, and that the pre-eminence of African-American singers on the operatic stage stems from the music training of church choirs.

A Graphic Novel About North Korea

In Pyongyang, Mr. Steven Riddle of Flos Carmeli offers a review of "[a] graphic 'novel' by animator Guy Delisle recounting some of his experiences while visiting Pyongyang as head of an 'off-shore' animating group."

Here is what the reader can expect:

For example, at one point in the novel, Guy notices that he has not seen a single handicapped person. He asks his official guide and interpreter about this and is told that "North Korea is a homogeneous society and as such gives birth only to strong, healthy North Koreans--apparently without irony--or at least any that he would have been able to detect.

Gaudí's Sculptor

From the Gaudi and Barcelona Club come these pictues of Etsuro Sotoo and some of his work:

It this gentleman's task to fill out the Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Familia begun by Antoni Gaudí in the 1880s.

Here is an account of the sculptor's conversion to Catholicism: Famoso escultor japonés descubre la fe estudiando a Antoni Gaudí / Japanese Sculptor Found the Faith by Studying Antoni Gaudí.

In Defense of Pessimism

About that "most un-American of philosophies," the indefatigable Mr. Daniel Larison offers us two posts about a review of a new book on the subject with his own thoughts on the same in The Curse of Optimism, The Blessings of Pessimism and Pessimists Of The World, Unite! You Have Nothing To Lose But Your Gloomy Predictions!

Among many valuable insights, Mr. Larison notes that "orthodox Christian hope and pessimism in the world are two sides of the same coin" and that "Pessimism is a reasonable position... because man is a finite, flawed, created being who cannot overcome the structures inherent in his existence."

Mr. Larison's posts, and it seems the book as well, are must-reads for all those skeptical of the idea of progress.

Some Antiwar Analysis

From Antiwar.com, the place for antiwar analysis from the Right, come links to the following articles.

This article, How Washington Goaded Israel Into War by Prof. Stephen Zunes, runs counter to the conclusion reached in The Israel Lobby, by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt that America is the junior member of the alliance. If, as Prof. Zunes asserts, "[t]he Bush administration's larger goal apparently has been to form an alliance of pro-Western Sunni Arab dictatorships," the neoconservatives prove themselves to be even more sinister, and inept, than previously thought.

"[W]hat could be more revolutionary, more destabilizing, more antithetical to the conservative agenda than a crusade to conquer the world?" asks Mr. Justin Raimundo, noting the dissent among prominent Republicans, in Right Hook: Conservatives rebel against the War Party.

In The Islamic Way of War, Prof. Andrew J. Bacevich offers this reality check:

Despite overheated claims that the so-called Islamic fascists pose a danger greater than Hitler ever did, the United States is not going to be overrun, even should the forces of al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iraqi insurgents, and Shi’ite militias along with Syria and Iran all combine into a unified anti-Crusader coalition.

Prof. Bacevich also notes that we will we unable to win on their turf.

Schönborn, Science, and Scientism

I find myself becoming more concerned about the dangers of Scientism, defined by Prof. Wolfgang Smith in The plague of scientistic belief as "philosophical opinions that masquerade as scientific truths."

His Eminence Cardinal Schönborn, shares this concern, as evidenced in this article: Cardinal Schönborn Proposes Evolution Debate: Calls for More Science, Less Ideology.

In the article, His Eminence is reported to have asserted that "there is 'no conflict between science and religion,' but, rather, a debate 'between a materialist interpretation of the results of science and a metaphysical philosophical interpretation.'"

Here's more:

Cardinal Schönborn, who sparked a worldwide debate in 2005 with an article in the New York Times on the subject, called for clarification of the difference between the "theory of evolution" and "evolutionism," the latter understood as an ideology, based on scientific theory.

By way of example, the cardinal mentioned Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who saw in the publication of Charles Darwin's "The Origin of Species," "the scientific foundation for their Marxist materialist theory. This is evolutionism, not theory of evolution."

The archbishop of Vienna warned against the application of this evolutionist ideology in fields such as economic neo-liberalism, or bioethical issues, where there is the risk of creating new eugenic theories.

[....]

The cardinal said that 150 years after Darwin's theory, "there is no evidence in the geological strata of intermediate species that should exist, according to Darwin's theory."

He continued: "He himself said in his book that this is a hole in his theory and asked that they be found.

"This should be discussed in a serene manner. If a theory is scientific and not ideological, then it can be discussed freely."

I am not one to get that worked up about the Evolution debate. Still, mainly as reaction to the fundamentalists and zealots who allow no discussion of Evolution, the chief tenet of their materialistic faith, I have chosen to be a proponent of Special Creation.

Bishop An Shuxin

After a decade in prison, China 'frees' underground bishop.

More can be learned about the brave and faithful Catholics of China from The Cardinal Kung Foundation.

Distributivism and Airline Security Repression

In linking to an article with the title Airline Insanity Merely A Beta Test For Police State Caste System, Mr. Roy F. Moore of The Distributist Review has this to say about the new measures' incompatibility with Distributivism:

This is not Distributist because it means more government control over our lives via who should travel, what they should carry, whether "resistors" will be punished or no. This is not so-called "conspiracy theory", for conspiracy is hidden by nature. This is all in the public eye, all out in the open.

Read the rest of Mr. Moore's post: Are US, UK Airports Now Test Labs For Repression?

Lina Joy

To be honest, I had little interest in this developing story, wrongly assuming, for whatever reason, that the Malay woman had converted from Islam to one of any number of Protestant sects operating in Malaysia. Learning that it was to the True Faith that she converted, I find myself much more concerned: Church that baptised Lina Joy, convert from Islam, is reported.

The parish that received the beautifully named women was The Church of Our Lady of Fatima in Brickfields, the heart of Kuala Lumpur's Tamil community.

Miss Joy is fighting for the right to have her conversion recognized by law, as she is currently ineligible as a woman to marry a non-Muslim. Here is an article about her case: Malaysia: woman fights for right to convert.

Rethinking Alliances

Today, I was flipping through the channels at the in-laws' and stopped at an impressive looking gentleman with a full beard. By appearances he was a Muslim, and was in a discussion with an atheist, and a self-described "liberal Episcopalian" academic.

I later found out the program was Closer to Truth and the episode provacatively entitled Can Religion Withstand Technology? The impressive gentleman turned out to be Muzaffar Iqbal, President of the Center for Islam and Science in Canada.

I didn't see much of the discussion, but witnessing a Muslim defending God and Religion against an annoying and arrogant atheist, the type who might count himself among The Brights, made me think. Catholicism and Islam will never be reconciled until Our Lady of Fatima brings Muslims to her Son, but until that time, we are facing a much greater common enemy.

Hilaire Belloc, in the The Great Heresies, saw in The Modern Phase an enemy far worse than The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed. And Modernism has morphed into something far more sinister since the time of Mr. Belloc's book. We are now facing Transhumanism and Extropianism:

Transhumanists advocate continuing the progressive transformation of the human condition, especially (but not exclusively) through technological means. The word transhumanism consciously evokes the tradition of humanism, i.e. the secular view of man as the "center" of the moral universe. However, transhumanism goes beyond humanism, because it does not accept some immutable, fundamental "human nature" as a given, but rather looks to continuing -- and accelerating -- the process of expanding and improving the very nature of human beings themselves.

With this as our enemy, and with all the resources it has at its disposal, we really need to rethink alliances.

The Pusan Mosque

From the History of Islam in Korea page:

I drove by it yesterday, on my way to visit my brother-in-law in the hospital. The picture above must be quite old, because the mosque is now dwarfed by surrounding apartment and office buildings.

Buchanan on“Islamofascism”

Readers of this blog and other thinking people by now know why the term is essentially meaningless, saying more as it does about the utterer than about those whom it is meant to describe. Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan goes over the reasons, and then delves into the term's application in Fascists Under the Bed.

Here is a taste:

Unsurprisingly, it is neoconservatives, whose roots are in the Trotskyist-Social Democratic Left, who are promoting use of the term. Their goal is to have Bush stuff al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran into an “Islamofascist” kill box, then let SAC do the rest.

The term represents the same lazy, shallow thinking that got us into Iraq, where Americans were persuaded that by dumping over Saddam, we were avenging 9/11.

But Saddam was about as devout a practitioner of Islam as his idol Stalin was of the Russian Orthodox faith. Saddam was into booze, mistresses, movies, monuments, palaces, and dynasty. Bin Laden loathed him and volunteered to fight him in 1991, if Saudi Arabia would only not bring the Americans in to do the fighting Islamic warriors ought to be doing themselves.

And whatever “Islamofascism” means, Syria surely is not it. It is a secular dictatorship Bush I bribed into becoming an ally in the Gulf War. The Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed in Syria. In 1982, Hafez al-Assad perpetrated a massacre of the Brotherhood in the city of Hama that was awesome in its magnitude and horror.

Asian Baby Busts

At a rate of 1.1 babies per woman, South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. This is far below the replacement rate of 2.1. One of the reasons is competitiveness in education. Korean parents shell out hundreds of dollars per month for private extra-curricular education for their children, in hopes of getting them into a top university.

The city-state at the tip of the Malay Peninsula, with a rate of 1.24, has proposed this solution: Singapore: Make love, not work. I recall a conversation with a Peruvian friend who worked at a shipyard here. When I asked if he and his Korean wife were planning to have a second child, he said, "We'd like to, but when I get home from work I'm so tired."

La Conquista and Manifest Destiny

"You know, on the whole, I don't miss Aztec Civilization," notes Mr. Mark Shea in linking to this article: Aztecs butchered, ate Spanish invaders. Mr. Shea goes on to post:

Conquistadors have been Standard Issue Bad Guys in the English-speaking world since forever. But on the whole, I think the destruction of a whole civilization built on slave labor, domination of surrounding native peoples (who were quite happy to see the Aztecs go), and human sacrifice by the hundreds of thousands was not the greatest loss the human race ever suffered. Also, the peaceful conversion of millions of Indians to Christ through our Lady of Guadalupe seems, on the whole, to be preferable to the more brutal methods of mass extermination and forced conversion that characterized our Protestant efforts north of the Rio Grande.

A look at demographics bears out Mr. Shea's point. In Catholic Mexico, Central America, and the Andean nations, you have a majority mestizo population, with, to varying degrees, minority European and full-blooded Indians populations. In Protestant North America, we have a miniscule population (less than 1%) of people we label Indians, who are in fact mestizos. Full-blooded Indians are not even to be found.

The Ministry of Fear at Work?

Mr. Ted Rall is not someone with whom I agree with on many issues, but he makes an interesting point about the "mass murder on an unimaginable scale" plot in Americans Shrug at Phony Binary Explosives Threat, linked to today by LewRockwell.com:

According to the respected and irreverent British technology publication The Register, the plot--if it existed--was a joke. Smuggling the component parts of triacetone triperoxide (TATP)--the liquid explosive we've been told was the object of the wannabe jihadis' vengeance fantasies--and successfully mixing them into a brew powerful enough to bring down a plane would require skills far beyond the capabilities of, well, anyone.

Click on the link to find out why.

After all, if "mass murder on an unimaginable scale" were as easy as making a cocktail with sports drink, why hasn't it been accomplished before? I can't help but think back to this "government set-up, engineered to hype the 'homegrown' threat of domestic terrorism" from two months ago: Feds Raid Patsy “Terror Cell” in Miami.

This seems to be yet another occasion to reflect on the famous Henry Louis Mencken (1880 - 1956) quote:

The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and hence clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

Christianity, Confucianism, Korea

Prof. Young-Kwan Kim examines the important role played by Confucianism in the growth of Christianity in Korea in his paper The Confucian-Christian Context in Korean Christianity.

The paper begins with a description of the life-work of this blog's namesake:

The Italian Jesuit missionary Matteo Ricci (1552–1610) arrived in Beijing in 1601 and began to propagate Christianity. Ricci mastered the Chinese language, introduced Western science to the Chinese, especially mathematics and astronomy, translated many Chinese classics into Latin, and wrote and published Christian literature. His Chinese book T’ien-chu Shih-i (The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven) was first published in Beijing in 1603. His primary purpose for writing this book was to introduce Christian doctrines on the basis of Confucian terms and thought. He thus avoids all negative attitudes toward Chinese Confucianism and its culture. This is because Ricci's mission policy, as Paul A. Rule argues, was that of accommodation through learning Chinese religion and culture.

The paper goes on to describe the impact Fr. Ricci's book had on Korean Confucian scholars, who were Catholicism's first Korean converts, and their influence on the development of a "familial community-based church." Prof. Kim notes that "it is argued that no one can fully understand Korean Christian thought without a pre-understanding of Confucianism."

Chen Guangcheng vs. the Culture of Death

Mr. Chen is the heroic subject of this story: China jails anti-abortion activist.

The first paragraph:

An anti-abortion activist investigating complaints by villagers who claimed they were forced to undergo abortions and sterilisations under China's controversial birth-control rules has been jailed on what his supporters called phony charges.

I could see this happening in the future in some parts of the West. How soon will it be before it becomes a "hate crime" to question a "woman's right to choose"?

The Propaganda Machine

Mr. Daniel Nichols on how it works, from Hitler vs. Satan:

[The media] will mention anti-Semitic comments from Mr. Ahmadinejad, though from what I have read these are taken out of context: "What will you do if Israel bombs Iran?", the interviewer will ask. "We will destroy Israel!", he will bluster, and the next day the headlines blare "New Hitler vows to destroy Israel!"

Sobran on War Crimes

Mr. Joseph Sobran, the "Reactionary Utopian," from Language in Rubble:

In war we naturally adopt a double standard, with one vocabulary for our side and another for the enemy. Americans still cherish the memory of Axis atrocities in World War II and justify their own, particularly the intensive bombing of German and Japanese cities — things nobody would have predicted, much less advocated, before the war broke out. Even today, we commonly justify the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki for “shortening the war” and even saving Japanese lives.

But which side’s rulers were tried and put to death for “war crimes” after the war? Which side is even now expected to do eternal penance for what it did during that war? America brought the world into the nuclear age, a permanent and irreversible horror. Was that a war crime?

No, we fret that these weapons of mass murder and mass terror may fall into “the wrong hands.” Ours, of course, are the “right” hands, in which they may be safely trusted. And we marvel that much of the world hates and fears us.

[link via Eunomia]

Societal Decline in South Korea

South Korea's rapid Modernization, erroneously but understandably called Westernization, has had dire consequences for the family, the basic unit of any society, as these two articles from today's news indicate: S. Korean fertility rate fell to record-low in 2005 and S.Korean divorces: quicker and cheaper than a movie.

Prodigal Son?

For the sake if his soul, let us pray that el Máximo Líder lives up to his given name, and that these reports are correct: Papers suggest Fidel may be regaining faith.


Our Lady of Caridad Del Cobre
Ora Pro Nobis

According to the article, the Cuban dictator has asked Brazilian proponents of Liberation theology Fr. Frei Betto and Fr. Leonardo Boff to be with him at the hour of his death. Although these two have been rightly disciplined and their movement justly criticized by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, they remain priests, and even if they were defrocked, would be able to validly administer the The Sacrament of Penance and Extreme Unction.

Strippers at Funerals

It's not the latest craze in Las Vegas, but a time-honored tradition from Old China that the Reds are trying to eradicate: Police crack down on striptease funerals...

The origin of the custom is Filial piety, as the article expains:

Striptease used to be a common practice at funerals in Donghai's rural areas to allure viewers... Local villagers believe that the more people who attend the funeral, the more the dead person is honored.

I have yet to attend a striptease funeral, but I did once happen upon a funeral at a Vietnamese Buddhist temple with a New Orleans-style brass band. And here in Korea, no funeral would be complete wthout booze, tobacco, and gambling.

For the record, I would rather not have strippers at my own funeral, but wouldn't object to a brass band, booze, tobacco, or gambling, all after The Sacrifice of the Mass, of course.

Pusan's Haeundae Beach

The above photo, from Wo ist der Strand?, shows why I will not be found there at anytime in August, when all Koreans have their vacation time.

The Shri Venkateswara (Balaji) Temple

Located outside of Birmingham, it is is dedicated to Lord Balaji, an incarnation of the god Vishnu: Europe's largest Hindu temple opens in Britain. The Beeb offers some images: In pictures: Tividale's temple.

More on the Late Shenai Maestro Bismillah Khan

From 'Bismillah played the tune of India', quoting The Times:

It wrote: "A pious Shia Muslim who lived almost all his life in the holy Hindu city of Varanasi, he came to symbolise Hindu-Muslim unity in India. It was indicative of the veneration in which he was held that on news of his death the Indian government declared a day of national mourning and announced that he would be accorded a state funeral".

Why Mary?

Mr. Mark Shea answers that question in a post entitled Using the Church as a Means to Attack Christ:

This strategy of blaming the Church for mucking up the "true meaning" of Christ is as old as the Church itself. You already find the apostles fighting it in the New Testament and every crank who comes along with a new and radical redefinition of Christian teaching does the same thing.

This is one of the reasons, curiously, for Marian doctrine. For the reality is that almost nobody attacks Jesus directly. They almost always attack him through his Church. Mary as icon of the Church serves as a reminder of this and her titles serve to guard various crucial truths about who Jesus is.

Take, for example, the first of the Four Marian Dogmas, that the Blessed Virgin Mary is the Mother of God, or in the East Theotokos (Θεοτοκος), "God-bearer."

This says more about Our Lord than it does about His Mother, does it not? He is fully God and fully Man. As the Council of Ephesus (A.D. 431) defined:

Since the holy Virgin brought forth corporally God made one with flesh according to nature, for this reason we also call her Mother of God, not as if the nature of the Word had the beginning of its existence from the flesh.

Various sects, in their rejection of Mary, have come to see Christ heretically as a demigod or a gentle teacher.

Isolated America

Pastor Bill Barnwell, writing for LewRockwell.com, poses the question, "Who Are the Real 'Isolationists'?"

"It is the internationalists and hawks who have weakened America’s standing and they have hardly been a force for international stability," he answers.

Korean Television

Historical dramas have been all the rage here in Asia for about ten years. I cannot imagine this kind of show on an American network: TV drama highlights life of female Japanese anarchist.

President Roh Moo-Hyun and the Dear Leader

Noting that "South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and North Korean leader Kim Jong-il think alike on so many issues that it is hard to tell them apart," Mr. Sung Yoon-lee, writing for the Asia Times Online, offers a must-read blistering critique of the current occupant of the Blue House in A Korean meeting of the minds.

Antonio S.C. Kim

My brother-in-law (my wife's elder sister's husband, to be exact) is in need of prayers. He's a cradle Catholic, husband of one wife, father of two daughters, ex-Marine, member of the Korean national S.W.A.T. team, and about the stand-upest fellow I have ever come across. He was involved in an accident on assignment, required surgery, will require more, will probably lose full use of his left hand, may lose a finger, and by extension a profession.

I ask Catholics to consider petitioning the intercession of his patron:



Saint Anthony of Padua
Ora Pro Nobis

I am proud to call him "兄님" (hyŏngnim), meaning "elder brother." Although he's a few months younger than I am, following the intricacies of the Korean familial system, he's considered my senior. When I learned that in conversation I would have to use honorifics, and he would not, I rebelled, as any American would. Upon reflection, I looked at this situation as one from which I might learn to reject two great evils: Pride and Egalitarianism.

Looking back, perhaps this was my first step toward becoming a Western Confucian.

Scientism and Traditionalism

The New Beginning, one of the most informative and eclectic blogs you're likely to ever encounter, today posts about a Prof. Wolfgang Smith, in a post entitled The Wisdom of Ancient Cosmology, which is the title of the professor's last book.

From An Interview with Wolfgang Smith on Science and Philosophy, a fascinating read, comes this biographical data:

Wolfgang Smith graduated at age 18 from Cornell University with a B.A. in mathematics, physics, and philosophy. Two years later he took an M.S. in theoretical physics at Purdue University, following which he joined the aerodynamics group at Bell Aircraft Corporation. He was the first to investigate the effect of a foreign gas on aerodynamic heating, and his papers on the effect of diffusion fields provided the key to the solution of the re-entry problem for space flight. After receiving a Ph.D. in mathematics from Columbia University, Dr. Smith held professorial positions at M.I.T., U.C.L.A., and Oregon State University till his retirement in 1992. He has published extensively on mathematical topics relating to algebraic and differential topology.

From the start, however, Smith has evinced a dominant interest in metaphysics and theology. Early in life he acquired a taste for Plato and the Neoplatonists, and sojourned in India to gain acquaintance with the Vedantic tradition. Later he devoted himself to the study of theology, and began his career as a Catholic metaphysical author. Besides contributing numerous articles to scholarly journals, Dr. Smith has authored three books: Cosmos and Transcendence (1984), Teilhardism and the New Religion (1988), and The Quantum Enigma (1995).

"If the cosmos were what scientism affirms it to be, our Catholic faith would be a mockery and our sacred liturgy an empty charade," announces Prof. Smith in an article entitled The plague of scientistic belief. He defines the subject of his article as "philosophical opinions that masquerade as scientific truths."

I first came across the term Scientism, which is also used by the Austrian School Economists, while reading Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief by Huston Smith, whose classic, The World's Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions, I enjoyed greatly. It was only after reading both of these books that I learned the author was a part of the Traditionalist School of René Guénon, many of whom ended up embracing Sufism.

The other Prof. Smith, Wolfgang, is solidly Catholic, but has written for some of this school's primary journals, the Sophia Journal of The Foundation for Traditional Studies and Sacred Web: A Journal of Tradition and Modernity.

Prof. Mark Sedgwick wrote about the movement in Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century. More can be learned at his website, Traditionalists.org, or in these interviews: A moment in reverse and Traditionalism: René Guénon's legacy today - Interview with Mark Sedgwick.

I find all this fascinating. Without knowing it, I was a Traditionalist in my late teens and early twenties, when I rejected Modernism and looked to the faith traditions of peoples East, West, North, and South for the Truth I finally found in Catholicism. The Ur-religion these Traditionalists seek is not outside of Catholic teaching, as The Catholic Encyclopedia entry on Religion attests:

It is Catholic teaching that primitive religion was a Divinely revealed Monotheism. This was an anticipation and a perfection of the notion of religion, which man from the beginning was naturally capable of acquiring. Religion, like morality, has apart from revelation a natural basis or origin. It is the outcome of the use of reason, though, without the corrective influence of revelation, it is very apt to be misconceived and distorted.

Now, I might count myself among Prof. Sedgwick's "soft Traditionalits," people like T.S. Eliot, E. F. Schumacher, or His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales.

"Consciousness-Disabled"

That is how my favorite contemporary Korean film director is quoted as describing himself in this article: Kim Ki-duk Eats Humble Pie for Dissing Korean Viewers.

Here is part of his mea culpa:

The scolding I got from the public made me look back at my films, and I’m starting to think that I made miserable, self-regarding films and exaggerated the dark and ugly side of Korean culture in an overbearing manner and so made audiences uncomfortable... I became aware of the fact that I’m consciousness-disabled, and that makes it very difficult to live in Korea.

I hope this does not mean his next film will be as happy and sappy as many other Korean films. I always found his films O'Connoresque in their depiction of the grotesque, only minus the Grace.

The Democrats' Departure from Jeffersonianism

My Mississippian grandmother raised me to hate the Republican Party. I've never quite been able to get over this, which is why this new blog*, Where Did the Party Go?, by the author of a book of the same title gives me some hope. From the blog here is a description of the book, subtitled "William Jennings Bryan, Hubert Humphrey, and the Jeffersonian Legacy:"

The Democratic Party has changed. More often than not, it loses national elections, and we have seen the erosion of important parts of its base. Taylor looks beyond the shortcomings of individual candidates to focus on the party’s real problem: Its philosophical underpinnings have changed in ways that turn off many Americans. The thought and careers of William Jennings Bryan and Hubert Humphrey are used as case studies to examine this change and its institutionalization under FDR is explained.

How democratic, really, is the Democratic Party? Presidential contenders still make the rounds of Jefferson-Jackson Day dinners, but how faithful has the party been to its founders and their principles? While many rank-and-file Democrats still hold to traditional views, that’s not the case with those who finance, manage, and exemplify the party at the national level. They have adopted an ideology that is inherently unpopular. Turning their back on the thought of Thomas Jefferson, the party has embraced the views of his arch-rival, Alexander Hamilton. If party leaders are committed to elitist ideas--some as old as eighteenth-century conservatism and some as modern as limousine liberalism and political correctness--is it likely Democrats will regain majority status on a consistent basis? What changed and why?

Perhaps we need to pay more attention to this blog: Right Democrat: a blog for conservative and moderate Democrats.

*link via Caelum et Terra

Where Mr. Buchanan and I Part Ways

Mr. Daniel Larison of Eunomia informs of the above writer's eponymous blog, Patrick J. Buchanan, which seems to be in part a promotion of his new book, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America.

This new book continues the theme of his earlier book, The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization. I found this latter book very enlightening, especially its anaysis of the effect on Civilization of what the author termed "The Four Horsemen of the Culture of Death:" Abortion, Euthanasia, Sterilization, and Contraception.

I found less enlightening the book's analysis of Immigration. If the West has set about to abort, euthanize, sterilize, and contracept itself out of existence, let people who obey God's first injunction to "go forth and multiply" come in to fill the void, be they Catholic or Muslim. I'd rather live in Eurabia than in Brave New World. I believe it was Saint Augustine of Hippo who, while lamenting the Fall of Rome, saw it as Divine retribution against a "Christian" Empire that had reintroduced, among other things, gladitorial combat. Still, there's little hope of Muslims invaders accepting the True Faith as the Visigoths did 1600 years ago. [But who knows what is not possible with the intercessions of Our Lady of Fatima.]

Turning from Europe to America is where Mr. Buchanan and I seriously part ways. Here is the publisher's blurb about the new book, quoted by Mr. Oswald Sobrino in Buchanan's Big Blunder*:

As Rome passed away, so, the West is passing away, from the same causes and in much the same way. What the Danube and Rhine were to Rome, the Rio Grande and Mediterranean are to America and Europe, the frontiers of a civilization no longer defended.

Mr. Sobrino gives two reasons why Mexicans are a part of Western Civilization:

1. Their native language is a Western European language, the language in which the first novel of the Western world was written: Don Quixote by Cervantes. Spanish is a child of Latin, the quintessential language of Western culture for centuries. In fact, in my personal opinion, compared to French and even Italian, Spanish is much closer in form to Latin than these other two Romance languages are.

2. They are overwhelmingly Roman Catholic. The Catholic Church is the mother of Western civilization. The central trunk of Western civilization is Catholic. In the broad scheme of Western history, the Protestant nations of northern Europe are a peripheral offshoot--some might say an aberration--from this main Catholic central trunk of Western culture.

Mr. Sobrino is correct about the first point: Spanish is the closest modern language to Latin─essentially it is Latin as spoken by Arabs, someone once said. But that second point is even more compelling. Could it be that immigrants from South of the Border are helping to establish "the mother of Western civilization" in North America?

At the end of the day, Mr. Buchanan and his ilk are not defending Western Civilization (at least in North America), but rather defending Anglo-American Civilization. There may be nothing wrong with that, but we should be clearer about our terms.

Immigration gets my goat a lot less than nativism. I just don't see the threat. I did my undergraduate study in Spanish, have travelled extensively in Mexico, Guatemala, Chile, and Argentina, and have known many Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, and Cubans. These fine people would make fine Americans, for the most part. And America never has been nor could it ever be a normal nation-state; it is and always will be a land of immigrants.

That said, I don't necessarily advocate open borders, and I acknowledge that their are problems with Immigration that must be solved. I don't have any solutions. But I'm not filled with fear. The American situation is a blessing compared to what is happening in Europe and that "repository of people in homosexual relationships" North of the Border**.

*link via Catholic and Enjoying It!

**see In Canada Lesbian Lovers Can Immigrate Far Easier than Normal Wives

The President, Abortion, and Frat-boys

Here is an article that clarifies Mr. Bush's pro-life credentials: President Bush supports over-the-counter access to abortion drug.

Perhaps the President feels the need to keep the frat-boy constituency pleased, knowing the college-age males are the demographic with the highest support for abortion, as Roe v. Wade "liberated" men from their most solemn manly responsibility.

Ua Mau Ke Ea O Ka Aina I Ka Pono

The Sovereignty of the Land is Always Righteous

"Monarchists are still unreconciled," notes LewRockwell.com in linking to this article about the Kingdom of Hawai`i and the lingering effects of annexation: Statehood celebration at palace gets heated.

For the record, here is the text of the 1893 address to Congress of that greatest of presidents and fellow Buffalonian: Grover Cleveland Opposes the Annexation of Hawaii.

Hawai'i was annexed, during the administration of one of America's worst presidents, William McKinley, who was assassinated, in Buffalo, by anarchist Leon Czołgosz.

Mongolia and Tibet

In an update to a story linked to earlier today, His Holiness hath landed: Dalai Lama begins visits in Mongolia.

The article describes the historic links between the two lands, and the origin of the title:

Mongolians have strong historical links to Tibet and have traditionally followed Tibet's esoteric, or Tantric, school of Buddhism. A 16th-century Mongolian king is thought to have bestowed the first Dalai Lama title — a designation which means "Ocean of Wisdom." In 1904, the 13th Dalai Lama took refuge in Mongolia, a landlocked nation sandwiched between China and Russia, when the British invaded Lhasa, Tibet's capital.

"Ocean of Wisdom" is an interesting choice of title for two land-locked nations, but I guess "Desert of Wisdom" or "Steppe of Wisdom" wouldn't work, although "Plateau of Wisdom" might.

Also, it's interesting to note that the Brits exiled a Dalai Lama before the Red Chinese ever did.

Bismillah

Ustad Bismillah Khan, the world-renowned master of the Shehnai - Indian Oboe, has left this world: Indian classical musician Khan dies.

I was introduced to his music in a class called "Oriental Art Music" during my undergraduate days. Khan's music made that of his contemporary, the patron of the Saint John Coltrane African Orthodox Church, look almost tame in comparison.

I was fascinated by his given name, which, according to the Meaning of Bismillah, means "In the name of Allah," i.e. God.

It turns out the phrase, also rendered Basmala, is used by our co-religionists:

Arabic-speaking Christians sometimes use the word Basmala (Arabic: بسملة‎) to refer to the Christian liturgical formula "In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" (Arabic: باسم الآب والابن والروح القدس‎, bismi-l-’abi wal-ibni war-rūḥi l-qudusi), from Matthew 28:19.

Đức Mẹ Lavang

This article, New Church Blends Two Cultures in Santa Ana, tells the story of Our Lady of La Vang, Santa Ana CA, which will offer Mass in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. We pray that the Traditional Latin Mass will be added.


Our Lady of La Vang
Kính mừng Maria đầy ơn phúc, Đức Chúa Trời ở cùng Bà,
Bà có phúc lạ hơn mọi người nữ, và Giêsu con lòng Bà gồm phúc lạ.
Thánh Maria Đức Mẹ Chúa Trời, cầu cho chúng con là kẻ có tội khi
nay và trong giờ lâm tử. Amen.

China, Mongolia, Korea

From Dalai Lama expected in Mongolia:

The people of Mongolia are awaiting the arrival of the Dalai Lama but many details of his visit are being kept secret because of possible protest from China.

In contrast, South Korea has kowtowed to China for years and repeatedly denied His Holiness a visa to visit: South Korea denies visa to Dalai Lama.

South Korea's policy harkens back to that Old Korea adopted toward Qing China called Sadaejuŭi (事大主義), translasted as "worship of the powerful," "flunkeyism," or "toadyism." The Khans, as history tells us, adopted quite a different foreign policy.

"Once upon a time when tigers smoked..."

옛날 옛날 호랑이가 담배피우던 시절에…

That phrase begins many Korean folktales. From The animal photo archive - tiger pictures album comes this pictoral evidence that there was indeed such an age:

One thing is certain, when tigers did smoke, there was much less anti-smoking zealotry.

"The Dangers of Excessive Activity"

Echoing St. Bernard of Clairvaux, the Holy Father had these wise words to say at yesterday's Angelus address, quoted in Beware of Too Much Activity, Says Pope:

It is necessary to pay attention to the dangers of excessive activity, regardless of one's condition and occupation, observes the saint, because -- as he said to the Pope of that time, and to all Popes and to all of us -- numerous occupations often lead to 'hardness of heart,' 'they are no more than suffering for the spirit, loss of intelligence and dispersion of grace.'

Chuang Tzu comes to mind. Here are two of the Quotations from Chuang Tzu by Thomas Merton:

When an archer is shooting for nothing, he has all his skill.
If he shoots for a brass buckle, he is already nervous.
If he shoots for a prize of gold, he goes blind or sees two targets --
He is out of his mind!
His skill has not changed. But the prize divides him.
He cares. He thinks more of winning than of shooting--
And the need to win drains him of power.
(19:4, p. 158)

The non-action of the wise man is not inaction. It is not studied. It is not shaken by anything. The sage is quiet because he is not moved, not because he wills to be quiet...
Joy does all things without concern. For emptiness, stillness, tranquillity, tastelessness, silence, and non-action are the root of all things.
(13:1, pp. 119, 121)

The MSM and My Thoughts on Nork Nukes

The main stream media (INSIDE JoongAng Daily) has quoted me, "harrumph[ing]" no less, about the predictions of a North Korean nuclear test:

But Joshua at "The Western Confucian" (http://orientem.blogspot.com/), just isn't buying it. "Forgive me for being skeptical, but with these reports surfacing every once in a while, it's hard not to be," he harrumphs. "Reports of ‘suspicious vehicle movement' together with ‘the view of the intelligence community that a test is a real possibility' just don't fill me with fear."

[from [GOING TO THE BLOGS]MEDIA WEIRDNESS]

Han — 恨

Reminding us that "[i]t's not our freedoms that fuel Arab anger," Mr. Stephan Hand of TCRNews Musings links to today to this article on the media and mobocracy: How 9/11 gave way to grief culture. Here's a taste:

As an event, 9/11 was a perfect entry point into the softness and indulgence and inwardness that mass media are most comfortable exploiting. In this, it was clearly part of what came before, the high-rated bathos of the deaths of Princess Di and JFK Jr. (or more recently, for that matter, the cat stuck in the wall of a West Village bakery), the media’s hunger for strong emotion coupled with its ability to make huge numbers of people think the same thing at the same time. The journalistic necessity of putting faces on the story minted a huge new class of celebrities, dead and alive. Jokes, of course, could be told about Princess Di and JFK Jr. But the grief culture that had just been born imposed its own form of correctness. The circles of loss and victimhood created a new etiquette—who could speak first, what could be said.

Of course, there is nothing wrong with grieving, which is appropriate and necessary. Grief culture, however, is something entirely different. Ultimately, it is about "feeding [one's] own ego," as noted by this article from the land that once prided herself on her stiff upper lip: 'Mourning sickness is a religion'.

Also, I cannot help but be reminded of the Korean concept of han (恨), defined by 야후! 사전 as "heartburnings; a bitter [an ill] feeling; a grudge; a spite; a resentment; ... hatred; hate; rancor." I would add "victim mentality" to the list. These feelings in indivuals are one thing, but when whipped up by the media to a national frenzy, they are quite another, as witnessed in the aftermath of the tragic accidental traffic deaths of two middle school girls, documented here: USFK Accident and Anti-American Orgy.

I'm still not quite sure what to make of the fact that the accidental deaths of two middle-school girls produced more displays of public outrage than did the intentional murders of three-thousand men, women, and children.

In Defense of Second-hand Smoke

My parents-in-law visted yesterday. Like most Korean gentlemen in their sixties, my children's maternal grandfather smokes. He had a cigarette or two in our normally non-smoking home, on the so-called "veranda." That I did not object would probably would lead some to suggest that my children should become wards of the State. The majority Canadians and Americans I know here in Korea would throw a conniption fit in such a situation, or in the very least use it as an opportunity to gloat about how enlightened North Americans are as compared to backward Asians.

When I first heard about second-hand smoke─apparently it "was invented in the mid-nineties by the Clinton administration"─I knew it to be a lie. Sure, maybe the smoke itself is more dangerous the moment it leaves the cigarette than smoke passing through a filter, but it is immediately dispersed and only inhaled in miniscule amounts.

I went online and found this by Mr. John Bloom: Second-hand Smoke Screen. Here is how it begins:

If you were to be strapped down on a surgical table while four guys exhaled smoke directly into your mouth and nostrils for thirty years, you might get lung cancer forty years after they stopped--but it's not likely.

The article goes on to debunk the "junk science" behind the second-hand smoke industry in the US and Canada. TIn his debunking, the author cites a study that indicates that "people who work eight hours a day in heavy-smoking environments" [my empasis] inhaled the equivalent of between 0.2 and 4.3 cigarettes per year!

From the Salem Witch Trials, to Prohibition, to the McMartin Ritual Abuse Cases, to WMD in Iraq, we North Americans tend to go bit overboard in finding Evil where it does not exist. This must be part of our Puritan heritage.

A Movie Ahead of Its Time

With torture now part of the American arsenal in the War on Terror™ (see The CIA Cruelty Authorization Act of 2006), this powerful line of dialogue from The Siege (1998/I) comes to mind:

You have the right to remain silent. You have the right to a fair trial. You have the right not to be tortured, not to be murdered, rights that you took away from Tariq Husseini. You have those rights because of the men who came before you who wore that uniform.

It is too bad that this movie is best remembered for the controversy it engendered by depicting some Arab Muslims as, of all things, terrorists. Never mind that other Arab Muslims were depicted as loyal American citizens or that the film decried the unjust treatment they suffered. It was a better, more effective film for portraying its terrorists as real people, not Hollywood villains, and for not attempting to avoid controversy by casting neo-Nazis as its terrorists, as did a later movie I didn't bother to see.

It was released only eight years ago, but could this film be made today? Regardless, it should be seen today.

Hitchens Quotes

Mr. Daniel Larison of Eunomia offers some food for thought from Peter Hitchens' blog.

First, Hitchens On “Islamic Fascism” and Al Qaeda:

And then there is the great controversy about Islam and terror and something called ‘Islamic fascism’ Beware of this word ‘Fascism’ George Orwell pointed out years ago that this was now a meaningless word, except insofar as it always meant ‘a person I don’t like, and you shouldn’t like either’. There are a number of conservative commentators who are convinced that Islamic militants are at war with ‘the West’ and that something called ‘Al Qaeda’ is constantly seeking ways of making physical war on us. I am unconvinced. And though I do think there is an Islamic danger to Europe, I think it is of a different kind.

I do not think there has ever been any such organisation as Al Qaeda, which is at most an ideology (see Jason Burke’s illuminating book on the subject). Muslim militants confuse the issue by adopting the name ‘Al Qaeda’ on various websites for various groupings in various places, but this is in a long tradition of people adopting the names their enemies have given them. There is no bearded Bond Movie villain sitting in a cave controlling all Islamic terrorism like a vast spider’s web.

Second, Hitchens On Morality And War:

What, then, does that make our bombing of German cities, especially the deliberate targeting of densely-packed working class areas (where opposition to Hitler was concentrated) with the deliberate intent of killing as many people as possible? I cannot see the logic here. If we are right (as we are) to be outraged about the Nazi tyranny’s loss of morals when it attacked our civilians, how can we defend our own decision to follow (and redouble) their example? Had our attacks been effective, I suppose a case could be made out for them. But they diverted valuable aircraft from the Battle of the Atlantic, the gravest single threat to our survival in that war once the Battle of Britain was won. The idea that our bombing of German civilians saved us from the Nazis seems to me to be entirely false. How did it do this? What did it prevent them from doing which they would otherwise have done?

This is emphatically not hindsight. The military scientists Henry Tizard and Patrick Blackett, among others, argued strongly in Whitehall that Arthur Harris’s bombing of civilian homes would not destroy German morale or do much damage to their war industries. Equally importantly Bishop George Bell of Chichester, a far from naive man who had before the war been in close touch with anti-Nazis in Germany and who intervened to help Jewish refugees reach Britain from Germany, attacked the bombing of unarmed women and children as early as 1941, and continued to do so throughout the war. He also argued that the bombing, by failing to distinguish between people and regime, doomed German opponents of Hitler to fail in their 1944 plot. He was in a position to know.

Quote Meme

Unable to resist a good quote, as my side-bar indicates, I was also unable to resist this latest meme from Mixolydian Mode:

Go here, to the Random Quotations page, and look through random quotes until you find five that you think:

a) reflect who you are

OR

b) what you believe.

Here are my results:

When you travel, remember that a foreign country is not designed to make you comfortable. It is designed to make its own people comfortable.
─ Clifton Fadiman

That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves.
─ Thomas Jefferson

What a mistake to suppose that the passions are strongest in youth! The passions are not stronger, but the control over them is weaker! They are more easily excited, they are more violent and apparent; but they have less energy, less durability, less intense and concentrated power than in the maturer life.
─ Edward Bulwer-Lytton

To us, the moment 8:17 A.M. means something - something very important, if it happens to be the starting time of our daily train. To our ancestors, such an odd eccentric instant was without significance - did not even exist. In inventing the locomotive, Watt and Stevenson were part inventors of time.
─ Aldous Huxley

The best [man] is like water.
Water is good; it benefits all things and does not compete with them.
It dwells in [lowly] places that all disdain.
This is why it is so near to Tao.
─ Lao-tzu

"The Time it Takes to Drink a Cup of Tea ─ 飲一杯茶的功夫"

An article about this blog's namesake, Matteo Ricci on Tea, deals more with fellow Jesuit Athanasius Kircher's China Illustrata, published in 1667, than it does with the original "Western Confucian" himself. The lives and work of both Matteo Ricci, S.J. and Athanasius Kircher, S.J. have no parallel in modern times.

O tempora, o mores!

This disturbs on many levels, yet it is but a sign of the times: BBC Feminist's Sordid Suicide Pact Made Public.

Ms. Jenni Murray, the Beeb Feminist of whom the headline speaks, says that she "plans to end her own life when she becomes a burden to those around her." The article says "that she does not want to be 'trapped' into caring for her mother who is ill with Parkinson’s disease" and that she "is angry that, having fought so hard to become liberated and independent, women are now being trapped into caring for dependent parents."

Also from the article:

Murray complains that the law against assisted suicide is supported by a “religious minority” who hold to an outdated moral view that human life is inherently valuable and that children have a legitimate obligation to care for elderly parents.

That "outdated moral view" lies at the foundation of Western Civilization, and let us pray that it is not a "minority" position in the West, although I fear that it is becoming one if it has not already.

A Confucian perspective may be helpful. Here in Confucian Korea, where in a classroom gasps of horror are heard when I lead university students to figure out what the word "patricide" means, the idea that adult children have an "obligation to care for elderly parents" is simply a given, although it is sometimes transgressed. [Abusus non tollit usum.]

In his excellent essay Confucius Today, Mr. Jim Kalb notes the philosophy's enshrinement of the family as "the prime embodiment of involuntary duties to particular persons," as opposed to the modern liberal treatment of the same as "a private sentimental or contractual arrangement among its members." The very idea of "involuntary duties" is offensive to the modern liberal mind.

Here's more from the article:

The program highlights the growth, especially in Britain, of the idea of an “obligation to die.” Most leading thinkers in the bioethics field endorse euthanasia and assisted suicide and often argue that elderly and ill patients have the obligation to end their lives to relieve pressure on families and the health care system.

In 2004, Baroness Mary Warnock, Britain’s leader in bioethics, said unequivocally that the ill and elderly had an obligation to die as soon as possible so as not to burden relatives and the medical system. Baroness Warnock, called Britain's “Philosopher Queen”, said in an interview, “In other contexts sacrificing oneself for one's family would be considered good. I don't see what is so horrible about the motive of not wanting to be an increasing nuisance.”
 
She said, “I am not ashamed to say some lives are more worth living than others.”

How close are the Baroness's words to the concept of lebensunwürdigen Lebens ("life unworthy of life") from the T-4 Euthanasia Program of 1930s Germany. Perhaps Rush Limbaugh, with whom this blogger disagrees on many, if not most, issues, is not that far off the mark when he speaks of "Feminazis."

[link to article via Shrine of the Holy Whapping]

I'll Believe it When I See It

Forgive me for being skeptical, but with these reports surfacing every once in a while, it's hard not to be: North Korea may be preparing nuclear bomb test: report. Of course, no article on the DPRK is complete without the requisite photo of the scary soldier* from P'anmunjŏm:

Reports of "suspicious vehicle movement" together with "the view of the intelligence community that a test is a real possibility" just don't fill me with fear.

*This is not to suggest that they cannot be scary if they so chose, as was the case thirty years ago today, The Marmot's Hole reminds us, during the Axe Murder Incident.

The JonBenet Ramsey Case

Mr. Robert Koehler, expat Korea's premier blogger, has a big scoop: JonBenet Ramsey murder suspect taught in Korea. According to his resumé (JohnKarr), he "was a classroom teacher of English for children aged 6 to 12."

All I have to say about this case, other than that the above is quite scary and that child beauty pageants are quite creepy, is that the lynch-mob that went after the poor girl's parents should watch The Ox-Bow Incident (1943) and reflect.

A Linguist on "Islamo-fascism"

Prof. Geoffrey Nunberg, in 'Islamo-Creeps' Would Be More Accurate*:

in the mouths of the neocons, "fascist" is just an evocative label for people who are fanatical, intolerant and generally creepy. In fact, that was pretty much what the word stood for among the 1960s radicals, who used it as a one-size-fits-all epithet for the Nixon administration, American capitalism, the police, reserved concert seating and all other varieties of social control that disinclined them to work on Maggie's farm no more.

Geoffrey Nunberg - pieces from Fresh Air/NPR were always well worth a listen.

*Use BugMeNot.com to bypass registration.

Confucius on Innovation

子曰：「述而不作, 信而好古, 竊比於我老彭。」

The Master said, 'I transmit but do not innovate; I am truthful in what I say and devoted to antiquity. I venture to compare myself to your Old P'eng.'

Le Maître dit : « Je transmets, et n'invente rien de nouveau. J'estime les Anciens et ai foi en eux. Je me permets de me comparer à notre vieux P'eng. »

[Chinese from Analects of Confucius; English translation by D.C. Lau and French tranlsation by R. P. Séraphin Couvreur from The Analects of Confucius - Lun Yu VII. 1. (151)]

Better Times

From The New Crusade comes a link to this this post about the Greatest of Centuries: If We Were As Free As 1253.

North Korean Floods

Let us pray for the long-suffering people of North Korea: Group: 54,700 Dead, Missing in N. Korea.

Six Tiber-Swimmers

Mr. Bill Cork of Built on a Rock today links to Going Catholic, an article about six Protestant theologians who embody John Henry Cardinal Newman's maxim that "[t]o be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant."

Here is what fellow ex-Lutheran Mickey Mattox said before his conversion to Rome:

We as a family want to venerate the Blessed Virgin Mary, and to unite our prayers with and to the holy martyrs and saints. We want the holy icons, the rosaries, the religious orders, yes the relics too . . . and to practice and experience the real presence of Christ in the Eucharistic meal while retaining the bond of love and fellowship in communion with the bishop of Rome.

The British Ambassador to Uzbekistan on the U.K. Terror Plot

A conservative blog for peace and Notes from underground link to this post by Ambassador Craig Murray: The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?

Here is part of his answer:

None of the alleged terrorists had made a bomb. None had bought a plane ticket. Many did not even have passports, which given the efficiency of the UK Passport Agency would mean they couldn't be a plane bomber for quite some time.

In the absence of bombs and airline tickets, and in many cases passports, it could be pretty difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt that individuals intended to go through with suicide bombings, whatever rash stuff they may have bragged in internet chat rooms.

The Ambassador's conclusion? "Be sceptical. Be very, very sceptical."

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei

On the occasion of yesterday's solemnity, many Catholic bloggers reflected on the Role of Our Lord's Mother in our lives. Fr. Jim Tucker posted a fine photograph pf Pope Pius XII Defining the Assumption, with many explanations. TS reminded us that Mary's a Uniter, Not a Divider, pointing to her œcumenical character. And the Whapsters gave us St. Maximilian's Rule of Life for those Consecrated to the Blessed Virgin, which is very helpful.

I am firmly convinved that it was Our Lady who led me to and helped me grow in the Faith her Son established. I visited the Shrine of Guadalupe twice as a pre-Catholic. When I fled Protestantism and joined a Korean RCIA course halfway through, the first night I was handed The Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary by a nun, taught to pray it, have been praying it every day since, and have become a member of The Confraternity of the Rosary. During the past eighteen months, I have seen Our Lady's intercessary work in our daughter's medical treatment, most notably under her title of Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal.

[image from the Seton Hall Univresity Library Gallery]

The Argentine on my Mind [Part 2]

In today's first post, I speculated about opening a private school for the teaching of English in Argentina after having read an article about the low cost of doing business in that country. The post led to a combox conversation with Mr. Tracy Fennel of CORPUS MEUM. Since they disappear after time, I will post my HaloScan.com - Comments on the school's name and its content below:

I remember there being in Santiago an Instituto Abrahán Lincoln, which offered language courses and cultural programs.

I'd like to do the same, but would have to choose a more worthy namesake, such as Instituto Jorge Washington or Instituto Tomás Jefferson, although the former sounds too yanqui, and might become a target for the Guevaristas.

Either of the great presidents from my hometown, Buffalo, would be suitable choices: Instituto Millard Fillmore or Instituto Grover Cleveland. The latter was an anti-Imperialist, so that would score some political points. Instituto Leon Czolgosz, after the anarchist who shot Pres. McKinley in Buffalo, might be a bit too political, and it doesn't sound English enough.

Instituto Dorothy Day would be great, but it would be hard to live up to her saintly reputation. Instituto Santa Isabel Ana Seton or Instituto Santa Catalina Drexel would both go well with education.

Instituto Beata Kateri Tekawitha would express my interest in indigenous America, as would Instituto Nicolás Alce Negro, after the Sioux Catholic catechist who's beliefs were distorted by John G. Neihardt's book.

I could go literate with Instituto Nathaniel Hawthorne, Instituto Henry Adams, or Instituto Flannery O'Connor, or Anglophilic with Instituto T.S. Eliot.

Anyway, apart from the name, I'd offer English courses, of course, but also other diverse lectures on, for example, the Old Republic and for which it stood, Los San Patricios, Russell Kirk, The Catholic Worker Movement, Thomas Merton, Agrarianism, the films of John Ford, etc.

This is, of course, little more than a summer daydream, but let me continue it a bit further. Since I'd like to have crufixes on the wall of every classroom, I'd better choose a Catholic namesake, either Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton, Saint Katharine Drexel, Blessed Kateri Tekakwitha, Dorothy Day, or Flannery O'Connor, all women, American, Catholic, and saints, whether canonized or not. Among them, I lean towards the last on the list.

El Instituto Flannery O'Connor it is, then. I could even raise peafowl on the side. I could fly the Stars and Bars alongside, or maybe even in place of, the Stars and Stripes, while at the same time offering lectures on New Orleans Jazz or Country Blues. Miss O'Connor was a conservative who knew that nothing was more shocking than the conventional, worthy herself of a place among the Reactionary Radicals.

I've never worked at a private school (hakwon - 학원) here in Korea, much less owned one. From what I understand, they rake in money hand over fist. Nonetheless, they cater by and large to children, whom I've never been interested in teaching. To make matters worse, one would have to deal with Korean mothers and their "skirt wind" (chima param - 치마 바람), a Korean idiom which refers to the excessive desire of mothers for their children to achieve educational excellence.

My first paying job in teaching was at at a place called the Instituto Chileno-Canadiense in Santiago, and I taught businessmen. The Instituto Chileno-Norteamericano in the same city offered lectures on various topics; I attended one after Toni Morrrison won the Nobel Prize for Literature. Such lectures would be very rewarding to offer, but would attract very few here in Korea. Latin Americans, from my experience, are more open to things that are not materially beneficial.

Catholic Congressman and Amateur Obstetrician

Congratulations to Rep. Bobby Jindal for a new son and a job well done: Rep. Jindal Delivers His Own Son At Home.

This photo made available Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2006 by the Jindal family, shows Rep. Bobby Jindal, left, his wife Supriya and their newborn son Slade Ryan. When Supriya woke with labor pains early Tuesday, Rep. Jindal barely had time to call 911 before the couple's third child was born at their home. Slade Ryan Jindal arrived before the ambulance did at approximately 3:25 a.m. Rep. Jindal, per instruction by phone from a nurse at the doctor's office, put the baby in Supriya's arms and tied off the umbilical cord with a shoe string. (AP Photo/Jindal family)

[Image from Republican Party on Yahoo! News Photos]

A convert to Catholicism from Hinduism, Rep. Jindal is, in his own words, "100% against abortion, no exceptions."

I could make some snide speculation about a member of the other party performing a Partial Birth Abortion in the same situation, but this is a non-partisan blog, and I will refrain.

Money, Masons, and the State

The Distributist Review links today to a lengthy, informative post by Br. Alexis Bugnolo on the above, The Façade of the Modern Economy, which begins thusly:

It is important to understand the profound perversions in modern society, so as to understand better the way to the establishment of the Social Reign of Jesus Christ.

One of the more important promises which the Masonic Order makes to nations, peoples, and individuals, is that of prosperty. But if we examine some of the foundations and conditions of the modern liberal economy, we see that it is a false economy, a façade, which is designed to enable the agenda of the Lodge.

The first principle of the modern economy is that the State alone has the authority to issue money, and that money itself has no objective correlative; that is it is not equivalent to anything real or fixed, in the economic sense: such as gold or silver, or something precious.

In the United States, we are likely to see the Freemasons as a social club and to dismiss any and all speculation as to the nefarious nature of the anti-Catholic organization as loony conspiracy theory-making. One need only to look to Catholic Europe or Latin America, especially Mexico, to see the evil done by Freemasons. For but one example, see Mexico and the Masons, the Sandanistas and Somoza. Here is the history of the secret society: Masonry (Freemasonry).

"Islamofascism"

Now that the term is no longer limited to blow-hards on talk radio or in newspaper columns but used by the leader of the Free World himself, it is worthy of closer attention. To that end, the term is dissected for what it is, meaningless, in two posts each by Fr. Jim Tucker, Commies, Fascists, and Other People We Don't Like and Sobran on Islamo-fascism, and by Mr. Daniel Larison, You Must Be A Fascist To Object To Using A Word Like Fascist and Some Call It Islam.

Lebanon Analysis

Ehsan Ahrari, in A dummy run against Hezbollah:

The ink was barely dry on reports that the Bush administration was involved in the planning of Israel's air attacks against Hezbollah than the official denials came out. Either way, with neo-conservatives, both within and outside the government, itching to attack Iran, the Israeli operation provided a possible template for a US assault on Iran's nuclear installations.

Kaveh L Afrasiabi, in Ceasefire, or quagmire by another name:

The United Nations resolution calling for a ceasefire in Lebanon from Monday has the potential to induce peace, vague and indeterminate as it is. On the other hand, it could just as easily prove the catalyst for another civil war in Lebanon, pitting the Lebanese army against Hezbollah, and doing Israel's work for it.

Patrick J. Buchanan, in Olmert's War, and the Next One:

With our War Party discredited by the failed policies it cheered on in Lebanon and Iraq, there will come a clamor that Bush must "go to the source" of all our difficultly – Iran. Only thus can the War Party redeem itself for having pushed us and Israel into two unnecessary and ruinous wars. And the drumbeat for war on Iran has already begun.

Thomas Fleming, in Making Sense of the Crisis:

George Bush, the impartial referee in Middle Eastern conflicts, has declared a winner in the latest round. Israel has defeated Hezbollah by a TKO. And all this time we thought Israel’s war aim was to expel Hezbollah from southern Lebanon. Can even the President believe his own speechwriters when they make up such palpable lies?

Eric Margolis, in The Lebanon Curse Strikes Again:

As this column predicted when the fighting in Lebanon began, after all the barrages of self-righteous propaganda, massive bombing and heaps of dead civilians, in the end the two sides would negotiate through third parties – which they could have easily done after the minor border skirmish that triggered this totally unnecessary war. But PM Olmert, enraged by Nasrallah’s taunting that he was “small” compared to Ariel Sharon, went to war, egged on by George Bush, who rushed Israel fuel and munitions.

SKorea pays tribute to American soldiers killed for its liberation

No, that headline was nowhere to be found, but this one was: NKorea pays tribute to Russian soldiers killed for its liberation.

Mr. Robert Koehler, in his post Apologies, surrenders and Yasukuni, has this to say about yesterday's Liberation Day address by the South Korean president:

Still no mention of how, exactly, Korea got liberated, let alone which countries did the liberating, but I wasn’t expecting any, and I guess we don’t make it a point to say thank you to France on July 4 (although we should).

The Argentine on my Mind

My experience in Argentina is very limited. I went to the city of Mendoza, Argentina several times to renew my visa when I was a student in Chile, and fell in love with the place, and its wine. It was as pleasant as any small city in Upstate New York or Northern California.

Although settling in the United States or Korea makes more sense, I sometimes mull emigrating to a third country, and since both my wife and I majored in Spanish, Latin America, preferably the Southern Cone, would be a logical choice. I had been led to believe that the Argentine economy was a basket-case, but this article suggests that is not the case: Foreign entrepreneurs spice up Argentina.

I do not consider myself the entrepreneurial type, but perhaps Mendoza could use a private school for the teaching of English. Si hay algún mendocino quien lea esto, deje su comentario, por favor.

Assumpta Est Maria; Liberata Est Corea

Tomorrow marks both the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, known to Eastern Christians as The Dormition of the Theotokos, and South Korean Liberation Day. I had originally planned to begin this blog on August 15th, to coincide with the date's memorials, but the events in Lebanon prompted me to put the blog up early.

I'll mark the occasions by taking a blog day off, leaving you with this photo from Liberation and the Aftermath:

Chilton Williamson Jr. on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

Conservatism reflects the belief that man should live—individually and collectively—according to his nature, which is God-given and immutable. Liberalism insists either that there is no such thing as human nature or that it was improperly understood—and therefore incompletely or perversely expressed—before the 17th century. (Sometimes liberals appear to be arguing both of these contradictory propositions at once.) Clearly, no significant contemporary political philosophy, program, or party can be called conservative in the sense described above. (The exceptions are the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, but they are infinitely more than the sum of these things.) Just as clearly, every contemporary philosophy, program, or party is, according to my twin definitions, liberal, including the “conservative” ones. Hence it seems that conservative and conservatism are no longer relevant terms (though as relative ones they retain a certain usefulness), while liberal and liberalism remain as accurate as they ever were.

[This ends my series of excerpts. I urge all to go read the rest on your own.]

Yehudi Menuhin and the Six-Day War

Taki Theodoracopulos, in What is Left? What is Right?:

In June 1967, I was married to my first wife and living in Paris, playing tennis and polo. When the Six-Day War began, Israel asked for volunteers of any nationality and religion. It took me about one minute to decide. I presented myself to the Israeli consulate and was sent by bus to a gathering place near Clichy, where I spent an extremely uncomfortable night among young French Jews who occasionally would scream out “Israel Vivra!” Needless to say, we were all sent home the next day, Israel’s blitz attack having destroyed the Egyptian air force on day one, the Syrian army and the Arab Legion on days two and three. Then came the Egyptian army’s turn. After one week it was all over.

The reason I volunteered was that like many of my friends, I was pro-Israel. Two things made me change my mind: Yehudi Menuhin and the sinking of the USS Liberty and its immediate cover-up by the LBJ administration.

In London, Menuhin, a Jew, declared that he would go to Palestine and give a concert in aid of the displaced Palestinians. When I met him at a friend’s house, he told me things that were hard to believe: about the terror tactics of the Stern Gang and of Irgun, both initially formed to force the British out but who had turned to killing innocent Arabs in order to gain territory. Coming from a devout Jew and the greatest violinist of his time, the point sank in. I eventually made my way down to Palestine and saw the squalid camps the refugees were living in and heard about Deir Yassin, a village that lived in peace with its Jewish neighbors until the massacre by Irgun. As a result, 600,000 Arabs fled the Palestinian territories the UN had set aside for a Jewish state, ensuring a Jewish majority in the new state.

So someone who was ready to fight for Israel’s survival eventually turned pro-Palestinian, while terrorists like Menachem Begin, a future prime minister, were turned into heroes by the propagandists in Israel and in America.

Claes G. Ryn on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

Today “conservative” often means leftist, as in wanting to reshape the world in the image of a single ahistorical model (“democracy”). Many so-called conservatives are better described as Jacobins. Most neoconservatives are ideologically intense universalistic liberals. Needless to say, what Americans call liberalism has long been difficult to tell apart from European social democracy.

The Land of the Morning Flute

I've got two words for whomever it is practicing the Korean flute every morning in my neighborhood: "Thank you!"

Tea Mountain (Tasan - 茶山)

That was the pen name of Chŏng Yag-yong (丁若鏞) (1762-1836), a Korean neo-Confucian philosopher who embraced the Catholic faith.

Mr. T. Chan, who is much more knowledgeable in the subject than I am, has taken my last post of yesterday and expanded upon it in great detail in Korean Catholicism and Confucianism. Among the links is this one about the subject of this post: Chong Yak-yong "Tasan".

Years ago, I read about this philosopher in a book entitled Confucian Philosophy in Korea, in which he was considered a bit of a reformer for being quite open to foreign ideas and technology.

This comes from a review of a book I have been meaning to read for years, Chông Yagyong: Korea's Challenge to Orthodox Neo-Confucianism, reviewed by John I. Goulde:

Setton also grounds Tasan firmly within the history of Confucianism within Korea and demonstrates that Tasan's work, though a direct challenge to the Neo-Confucian orthodoxy of the day, must be seen as being part of an ongoing tradition of Confucian scholarship, rather than, as some moderns think, being opposed to it.

Here are two other links of interest I have dug up: Chuhsi's Confucian Philosophy in KOREA and Confucianism in Korea.

Martyr-Kings

Mr. Daniel Larison has a post on the above, the very idea of which "typically strikes low church folks as obscene and tends to offend the more liberally inclined," in reference to the Anglican Saint Charles I, King and Martyr.

Moltes Gràcies

"Many Thanks" to Senyor Xavier Basora, the polyglot blogger behind Buscaraons, for the following endorsement:

Quan Joshua annuncià que plegaria el seu blog, em hagué desanimat molt. Sempre he apreciat els seus escrits encara que discrepava de tant en tant. En tot cas, un dia quan vistava, el blog del Pr. Jim que Joshua havia començat un de nou anomenat the Western Confucian. El nou blog es dedica sobre el cristanisme al Corea del sur així com sobre el catolicisme. També segueix les notícies internacionals però no tan com abans. Trobo el no enfocament força interessant tenint amb compte que es a Asia, com a Africa, que el cristanisme i el catolicisme ha crexiat de manera fulgrant i no sabem quines seran les conseqüè Invito als meus lectors a passar al nou blog de Joshua i canviaré el enllaç de la meva llista de blogs.

Catholicism and Confucianism

Today marks this blog's first month online. Thanks in great part to two links from Fr. Jim Tucker of Dappled Things, the counter stands at just over 3000. To celebrate, I've found a couple of articles on this blog's theme.

First, Catholic World News (CWN) two years ago printed an article about modern South Korea entitled Confucian No Longer. The article, perhaps the best I've read on Korean Catholicism, describes rapid cultural and societal trends here in South Korea as being analogous to America in the 1960s, thus the title.

What I found more interesting, however, was an explanation of something that has always fascinated me: why the Novus Ordo Missae is generally so reverent in Korea and often so loopy in America, or rather, why Korean Catholicism seems so much more orthodox than does its American counterpart. Here is the answer to that question, and much more:

A Korean parish is a model of active community involvement. Under the control and direction of the pastor, many parishioners perform necessary duties. The laity assume much of the responsibility for advancing the faith in Korea, acting on a sense of empowerment that reflects the fundamental teachings of Vatican II. While the Church in the Western world suffered some serious negative fallout from post-conciliar reforms, the same could not be said for South Korea; membership in the Church increased dramatically after Vatican II.

Why did the message of the Second Vatican Council, with its emphasis on "the age of the laity," find such fertile soil in Korea? The Confucian ideal might furnish an answer to that question. Before the arrival of Catholic missionaries, Koreans lived and breathed Confucian thought. As the missionaries spread the faith, they discovered an intimate philosophical relationship between Catholicism and Confucianism.

The Korean people have always understood that family must perform the central role within any community. Catholic principles and Confucian tradition also are closely linked in emphasizing the importance of building community. Koreans have long believed that every individual has a responsibility to participate actively in community life, and to improve the world in which he lives. Accordingly, the Catholic hierarchy gained a foothold in Korea's political and economic life by stressing the social teachings of the Church.

Virtually all Korean parishes bear testimony to this emphasis on community involvement. Many meetings are held throughout the days and evenings, as lay Catholics hustle about the premises working on various tasks for their parish. Meanwhile others are found inside the church attending Mass or praying the Rosary. The only time of quiet in the parish comes on Monday, when the priest takes his weekly day off, and the church doors remain closed.

That describes my parish, and every other one I have ever visited.

Going from present to past, I came across a chapter in an online textbook, Korea in the Eye of the Tiger (part of the Korean History Project) entitled The Way of the Cross, which deals with Christianity's first inroads into the Hermit Kingdom. Here is an account of Korea's self-evangelization in the summary of the chapter:

Without priests or missionaries to guide them, a small group of Sirhak scholars began practicing Catholicism totally unaware of the social implications of their actions. With no understanding of the inherent contradiction between Catholicism and Confucianism and its future implications, they set the foundation for the Catholic Church in Korea.

I have to take issue with the phrases "totally unaware" and "[w]ith no understanding of the inherent contradiction between Catholicism and Confucianism." These gentlemen were Confucian scholars who had come to believe in the Truth of Catholicism. Thus, they undertsood both Confucianism and Catholicism from within, and saw no such contradiction. Their enemies were fundamentalists of a sort, who had only a limited understanding of Catholicism. Who is better to answer the question of whether there is an inherent contradiction between Catholicism and Confucianism, the former or the latter?

Blogging the Age of Faith

When these sinister times in which we live tempt one with the sin of despair, it might help to pay a visit to the The Roving Medievalist to remember that there was a happier age.

Should anyone tempted to leave a comment in defense these new Dark Ages we find ourselves in, before doing so, please read the Greatest of Centuries.

TS on a Roll

Video meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor is one of the most interesting blog's out there, as evidenced by the three latest posts:

The Sensualists - an answer the question of why it is men who are so attracted to "the 'smells and bells' of the old-style Latin and Eastern Rite liturgies."

The Theology of Beer Labels - a great read for beer-lovers, with a hidden reference to favorite Hemingway story

Suspicious Superstitions - a defence of that greatest of centuries, the Thirteenth

Whaling

Readers of my previous blog, Katolik Shinja, will remember that I am a supporter of whaling and that I myself enjoy whale meat. It seems clear that the eating of whale meat carries with it far fewer moral questions than does eating factory-farmed chicken, beef, or pork, the evils of which are well documented by former Bush speechwriter Matthew Scully.

Over at the The Inn at the End of the World today, there is a marvelous link to the Melvillean New Bedford Whaling Museum. My wife's hometown, the center of Korean whaling since pre-historic times, has one of its own, as this article reports: S. Korea: 'City of Whales' to regain former glory with festival, museum.

In Brief

Japan's baby bust: Japan's Socioeconomic Time Bomb.

Marjeyoun: Fleeing Lebanese Christians See Town Forever Changed*

A wonderful article on my homeland: On Route 20, Where the Past Is Present*

El líder máximo: Castro's Deal With the Soviet Devil*

No man left behind: Korean War Soldier Buried 55 Years Later

*Use BugMeNot.com to bypass registration.

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

If there are conservatives who believe in true liberty today, they were called liberals in earlier times. And any socialists today who call themselves liberals have simply stolen the term and converted it to mean its opposite.

Scott McConnell on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

The defining issue of our day is the Iraq War and American foreign policy. It has been so since the shocking attack of 9/11, an event that showed that the survival of the United States as a free society was unexpectedly at risk. Foreign policy, when the stakes are war, peace, and national survival, inevitably becomes the deciding issue when it moves to center stage. The division in this case was whether the United States would seek to isolate al-Qaeda from the Arab world in order to marginalize and destroy it. Or would it pursue policies that inevitably pushed more and more of the world’s one billion Muslims towards al-Qaeda’s view of America and the world? Astonishingly and recklessly, George W. Bush, influenced by neoconservative advisers who believe the only thing Arabs understand is force, chose the latter course. Under false pretenses, he invaded a country that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11, while abandoning America’s long-time effort to serve as an honest broker in the Israel-Palestine conflict. These policies and their consequences now dominate our age, pushing all the elements of the Left/Right division into the background.

John Lukacs on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

The real enemy is now the (outdated) idea of Progress, together with the (thoughtless) belief in Technology. Conservatives should be the first to recognize that. If they don’t, their demise will be worse than that of the liberals who, after all, had won—though only on one level and too late. A conservative who fails to protect and to conserve is nothing but a radical loudmouth of a bad sort.

Europe, China, and Culture

In a fascinating Asia Time Online article entitled A symphony of civilizations, David Gosset of the Academia Sinica Europaea suggests that it is culture, not economics or politics, that should be emphasized to foster mutual understanding and cooperation among these two great Old World civilizations. He accurately describes China not as a nation-state, but rather as the "Europe of the Far East" and suggests that the United States "is very singular and is culturally departing from its European foundation."

To make his anti-Huntingtonian case for Conservative diversity, Mr. Gosset provides quotes from some great thinkers:

If a true world-civilization is ever to be created, it will not be by ignoring the existence of the great historic traditions of culture, but rather by an increase of mutual comprehension.
-- Christopher Dawson

The gentleman is looking for harmony and not assimilation, the others are looking for assimilation without harmony.
-- Confucius

The aspect of American society is animated, because men and things are always changing; but it is monotonous, because all these changes are alike.
-- Alexis de Tocqueville

Reading his article, I cannot help but wonder what the world would look like had both Christendom and Confuciandom survived the upheavals of recent centuries.

A Conservative Perspective on Bombing Civilians

As someone who once considered himself somewhat of a Progressive, I was surprised to find so many Liberals, and the Neoconservatives among them, of course, who support the bombing of civilians, and not to find a single Conservative -- Paleoconservative, mind you -- who does. The reason is simple: a rejection of Moral Relativism.

[After reading one of Patrick Buchanan's denunciations of Harry "Give 'Em Hell" Truman -- read his comments in What is Left? What is Right? -- I debated a self-described "flaming Socialist" who insisted that the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were morally correct.]

Today, Daniel Larison posts these moving words from Peter Hitchens on Lebanon:

I grew up in a Britain which cheerfully accepted that it was right to bomb Germany to rubble, because they had started it. I entirely agreed with this view for many years. Then I began to read the full details of what happened when our bombs fell. I was particularly struck by the repeated accounts of the mad women, made insane by the loss of their homes and families, who roamed about Germany carrying their dead babies in suitcases; also by the reports of adult human figures, baked in airless cellars for so long during the Dresden firestorm that they were shrunk to the size of children; and of the great clouds of bluebottles gathered over the ruins of Hamburg after an RAF raid, so devastating that there was nobody to clear the wreckage or bury the huge numbers of civilian dead beneath the rubble. We may not have known then. We certainly know now. This is not a form of warfare that a Christian country can use.

The Israel Lobby

You might be surprised to learn that "[t]he Israeli embassy is calling American religious leaders - several times a day for two weeks in [one] case! - for public expressions of support." Mr. Jeff Culbreath has the details from mainstream news sources in his post entitled HOW ISRAEL MANIPULATES AMERICAN PUBLIC OPINION.

In Brief

Fabianus Tibo, Dominggus da Silva, and Marinus Riwu: Holy See intercedes on behalf of Indonesian Catholics sentenced to death and Stay of execution for three Indonesian sentenced to death

Chimera watch: Human-animal mixing going too far, report says

South Korean useful idiot watch: Conservatives cry foul over homages to N.K. heroes

Ross Douthat on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

Some conservatives think that liberalism-the-political-philosophy can be saved from liberalism-the-Baconian-project and that modernity can be rescued from its utopian temptation; others join Alasdair MacIntyre in thinking that the hour is far too late for that, and we should withdraw into our homes and monasteries and prepare to guard the permanent things through a long Dark Age.

Liberals, on the other hand, dream the same dream and envision the same destination, even if they disagree on exactly how to get there. It’s the dream of Thomas Friedman as well as Karl Marx, as old as Babel and as young as the South Korean cloners. It whispered to us in Eden, and it whispers to us now: ye shall be as gods. And no conservative dream, in the 400 years from Francis Bacon until now, has proven strong enough to stand in its way.

Andrew J. Bacevich on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

In a system as corrupt as ours has become, principles survive chiefly among those who occupy the political fringe—populists, pinks, aging New Leftists, agrarians, radical environmentalists, Catholic Workers, libertarians, and paleocons. When it comes to illuminating the hypocrisies and contradictions that afflict the American way of life, each of these groups has something to offer—which is why the thinking conservative will find more of value these days in The New York Review of Books than in National Review and why true-blue progressives are better off subscribing to The American Conservative than to The New Republic.

John Derbyshire on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

Going a bit deeper, conservatives are those who are pessimistic about the prospects for human nature and society. This is most obviously the case with romantic conservatives like Winston Churchill, who “preferred the past to the present and the present to the future,” and George Orwell, who “loved the past, hated the present, and dreaded the future.” Even a distinctly unromantic conservative like Dr. Johnson “laughed at schemes of political improvement,” though. In the U.S., where an optimistic attitude is more or less compulsory, all this is masked with a lot of uplifting squid ink like our current—not, in my opinion, very conservative—president’s professed belief that “the desire for freedom is inscribed on every human heart," a thing that is obviously false. True conservatives everywhere, however, even in America, know that we are doomed, doomed.

[As I work my way through this lengthy, fascinating, and inspiring collection over the next days, I will be offering similar posts quoting brief passages that I find particularly noteworthy.]

Jeremy Beer on Left and Right

A snippet from What is Left? What is Right?:

One of the most striking features of cultural discourse today is the inversion of terminology among self-identified “liberals” and “conservatives.” It is not just that the vocabulary of our leading “conservatives” is peppered with the grand abstractions (“freedom,” “democracy,” “progress,” “evil”) always preferred by power-obsessed revolutionaries and ideological zealots. That has been widely noted for some time now. Rather, it is that the terminology historically associated with the conservative impulse has not simply been forgotten or ignored but has been taken up by others—including those who consider themselves progressives or liberals. “Preserve,” “save,” “conserve,” “sustain,” “protect,” “heritage,” “tradition,” “community,” “place,” “decentralized,” “permanence,” “beauty,” “humane”—these former keywords of conservatism have largely migrated to other political quarters.

ROK Attitudes Toward the USA and the DPRK

In North Korea enjoys Southern makeover, Prof. Andrei Lankov, reviews a locally popular book for high-school students with the title Living in Two Koreas, One Nation, Two Lives. The article demands to be read in its entirity, but below will be a few excerpts

Here is how the professor describes the books portrayal of the United States

[T]he authors do not mention the US decision to dispatch troops to Korea after the North Korean invasion in June 1950, and they describe the Seoul takeover in September 1950 thusly: "The South Korean Army, which had retreated to the Namgang River under the ferocious attacks of the North Korean forces, reversed the situation through the Incheon landing on September 15." US forces comprised the overwhelming majority of the troops during this amphibious operation, but their participation in Incheon is not mentioned.

General MacArthur must be rolling over in his grave.

The book also mentions US Forces' role in the growth of prostitution after the war and the adverse effect of US aid on Korean agriculture, both of which are true.

It seems the book is guilty of sins of omission when it comes to the rosy picture of life in the North it paints, with no mention of gulags, state evictions, personality cults, or mutual surveillance groups:

[A] South Korean teenager will understand that North Korean life has a somewhat idyllic quality: job security, free housing, an iron-proof system of old-age pensions and, of course, the omnipresent collective spirit that is extolled at great length.

Moving from print to film, another Koreanologist, Prof. Aidan Foster-Carter, looks at a record-breaking movie here in the South in Here There Be Monsters. Here is the synopsis:

“Guimul” (“The Host”) is a monster movie, and a monster hit, drawing a record audience of 6 million — equivalent to one in eight South Koreans — in its first 11 days. It’s about a child-snatching mutant that rears up into Seoul out of the Han River, spawned by toxic fluid carelessly discharged from — guess where — an American military base.

Harmless fiction? Not quite. The director, Bong Joon-ho, says he based it on an incident in 2000 when a mortician with the United States military was arrested over a discharge of formaldehyde. Though the incident was regrettable, the uproar it created was out of proportion. There was no lasting pollution, much less any monsters.

This is what the professor has to say about South Korean attitudes toward the North:

To an outsider, South Koreans seem to have a double standard in terms of threat perceptions. Having been fed propaganda for years by military regimes that painted North Korea as an evil monster poised to devour them, they now seem to dismiss even factual claims as cold war scare stories.

Many of them see North Korea as a slightly delinquent brother who needs to be cajoled into better manners. China, too, is viewed more positively than it is by most of its other neighbors. By contrast, American motives tend to be suspect, and wicked Japan can do nothing right. (The Roh administration’s first reaction to the North’s missile tests was not to condemn Mr. Kim but to criticize Japan for making “such a fuss.”)

It’s not self-evident, to say the least, that this perceived hierarchy of threats is in South Korea’s true national interest. Without reviving the old knee-jerk demonization of North Korea, South Koreans might at least be given pause by the foreign ministry report that says the regime “has made all-out efforts to bolster asymmetrical strengths at a time when millions of its people have died of hunger.”

I recently read that General Douglas MacArthur advocated that American forces be removed from Japan and Korea to the Pacific islands. Fifty years later, we should heed his advice, not because of anti-Americanism, but because it is no longer in our interest to be here, as Patrick J. Buchanan stated three-and-a-half years ago in The Coming U.S. Retreat from Asia.

I must confess that one of my fantasies is to speak at an anti-American rally calling for the withdrawal of American forces and to use the Old Right, Anti-Imperialist, Little America arguments that Mr. Buchanan and other like-minded folk employ.

A 1909 Royalist Postcard

[image from 영친왕-태극기 함께 실린 日엽서 발견]

The Bavarian Pope and Chinese Lasses

Mr. T. Chan brings to our attention Taiwan's Lan Yang Catholic Youth Center's audience with the Holy Father:

[Image from Papacy and the Vatican on Yahoo! News Photos]

How do you say "¡Viva Cristo Rey!" in Bahasa Indonesia?

Fabianus Tibo, Dominggus da Silva, and Marinus Riwa are scheduled to face the firing squad fifteen minutes after midnight tonight: Thousands rally to save death row Catholics in Indonesia.

Dekalog

"[I]f television were like this even 10% of the time, it would be worth watching," says Mr. Steven Riddle in his review of The Decalogue I-III.

Krzysztof Kieślowski's "Dekalog" (1989), considered by many to be one of the greatest cinematic achievements of all time, is a series of ten separate but interrelated Catholic-tinged short films produced for Polish television in the last days of Communism. Here is my review from my previous blog: On the Tube.

Wow!

From Mixolydian Mode comes a link to Escher's "Ascending and Descending" in LEGO®.

In Brief

A more abundant life: Centenarians say faith source of longevity: survey

Pax Madonnica: Madonna infiamma Roma all'Olimpico

Another "terrorist" from south Lebanon*: The body of Lebanese Hadi Jaafar, 2, lies on the floor as he is prepared to be buried in the southern town of Ghaziyeh, near the port city of Sidon, - Yahoo! News UK

Tradition: Appeal Court judges walk in a traditional procession from Westminster Abbey

Useful idiocy: North Korea enjoys Southern makeover

*"[A]ll those in south Lebanon are terrorists who are related in some way to Hezbollah..." -- Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon Before the Qana Massacre

The Catholicization of Korea

Making the common mistake here in Korea of assuming the word "Chrsitian" to be synonymous with "Prostestant," Mr. Kwon Hyeok-ryul, a reporter for CBS (Christian Broadcasting System) in Korea, attempts to answer this question: Why is the number of Christians decreasing in Korea?

His conclusion is that South Korean Protestantism has moved from being "an avid advocate for democracy and human rights to the core group of the conservative right in Korea today."

Whatever his conclusion, he posts some good news for Catholics:

According to the 2005 Population and Housing Census Report by the National Statistical Office, the number of Christians in Korea stood at 8.6 million. Compared to 10 years before, the Buddhist population increased by 3.9 percent, whereas the Christian population decreased by 1.6 percent. In a large shift, Catholics in Korea increased by a whopping 74.4 percent. The results illustrate that among Korea’s three major religions, only the number of Christians decreased.

He does not speculate as to the reasons behind the "whopping" increase among Catholics, but I will.

During my RCIA study here in Korea, a nun told us that among Korea's non-religious population (about half the population), Catholicism was held in the highest esteem. This is due, I believe, to the Faith's commitment to both Social Justice and Tradition. Koreans are, paradoxically, both egalitarian and hierarchical. The Church's emphasis on Social Justice appeals to the democratic side of the Korean psyche, while her emphasis on Tradition appeals to the Confucian side.

Catholicism is the ideal religion for the Korean people, as it is for all peoples.

Rethinking Political Terminology

The American Conservative has put online its examination by thirty thinkers of the whether or not "the designations 'liberal' and 'conservative' [are] still useful" and whether or not a binary Left/Right political spectrum describe[s] the full range of ideological options" in an age, according to Clyde N. Wilson, in which "'politics' no longer plays any significant role in governance:"

What is Left? What is Right?

I have not yet had time to do anything more than a quick scan with this article, but these words from Patrick J. Buchanan, in which he responds to being labeled a "neo-isolationist,” stood out

Most of us ... are not really ‘neo-’ anything. We are old church and old right, anti-imperialist and anti-interventionist, disbelievers in Pax Americana. We love the old republic, and when we hear phrases like ‘New World Order,’ we release the safety catches on our revolvers.

This should be of interest to all, especially those who were initially filled with hope but ultimately disappointed by the Crunchy Con, who turned out to be a Neocon with good taste, but later inspired by Reactionary Radicals.

Indeed, as Prof. Wilson states in his piece, "Politics against the imperial regime will have to be both defensive and radical, that is to say, it will have to be reactionary."

Don't Remember, Remember the Fifth of November

The Father of Our Country, a class act if there ever was one, in a 1775 letter, quoted by Jimmy Akin in George Washington Vs. Guy Fawkes Day:

As the Commander in Chief has been apprized of a design form'd for the observance of the ridiculous and chidish custom of burning the Efficgy of the pope - He cannot help expressing his surprise that there should be Officers and Soldiers in this army so void of common sense, as not to see the impropriety of such a step at the Juncture; at a Time when we are solliciting, and have really obtain'd, the friendship and alliance of the people of Canada, whom we ought to consider as Brethren embarked in the same Cause. The defence of the general Liberty of America: At such a juncture, and in such Cirumstances, to be insulting their Religion, is so monstrous, as not to be suffered or excused; indeed instead of offereng the most remote insult, it is our duty to address public thanks to these our Brethren, as to them we are so much indebted for every late happy Success over the common Enemy in Canada.

In his post, Mr. Akin offers more evidence of George Washington's religious liberal-mindedness, in this case toward the "Children of the Stock of Abraham."

What's the Hebrew Word for Dhimmi?

Lest we forget, Eunomia's Daniel Larison offers these words from Taki on Israel and Palestine:

Hamas was elected in Gaza because the Palestinian Authority was unable to negotiate the removal of a single Israeli checkpoint. Checkpoints which make life impossible for any Palestinian to live even a less than normal life. If anyone disagrees, and I’m sure there are many, all they have to do is read Mona El-Farra, a Palestinian doctor’s dispassionate of what it’s like living with fear and resolve. No access to drinking water, 22 hospitals without electricity, no fuel for generators because the borders in Gaza are sealed, children in intensive care and renal dialysis patients dying. Hundreds of operations postponed, absence of refrigeration, 30,000 children suffering from malnutrition. Yet when an Israeli soldier is kidnapped, while several hundred Palestinian women and children are locked up in Israeli jails, it triggers a response which has shocked civilised people everywhere, including, of course, in Israel.

*See Dhimmis and Dhimmitude.

Mr. Truman's Bombs

A LewRockwell.com article today by Eugene Jarecki entitled Truman Haunts Us offers pretty damning evidence to back up Gore Vidal's claim that "the Japanese were trying to surrender all that summer, but Truman wouldn’t listen, because Truman wanted to drop the bombs" with quotes from General Dwight D. Eisenhower, General Douglas MacArthur, and a host of other generals and admirals: Hiroshima: Quotes.

Here is part of what Ike had to say: "...the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing."

Also today, Amy Welborn, in a post entitled Mr. Truman's Degree, offers an excerpt of Catholic philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe's famous essay of the same title in which she states her reasons for protesting the president's reception of an honorary degree from her university.

Here is Dr. Anscombe's summation of her essay: "We can now reformulate the principle of doing evil that good may come: every fool can be as much of a knave as suits him."

Murdering Babies for Beauty

Jovan-Marya Weismiller links today to several articles that illustrate how The Culture of Death Marches On. This is perhaps the most revolting among them: Women Paid to Carry Baby to 12 Weeks before “Harvesting” for Beauty Treatments.

In Brief

We pray that this is not what Israel's war on Lebanon is a prelude to: Clearing the path for US war on Iran.

I've always found the letters of John an unsettling read: John’s teaching on love is an invitation, but also unsettling in its demands, Pope says.

Pray for Fabianus Tibo, Dominggus da Silva, and Marinus Riwa: Three Indonesian Catholics face firing squad on 12 August.

Pray for Marjayoun and Qlaiah: Israelis seize Christian towns in south Lebanon.

Here's an article about 21st Century courtship: Professor working on 'roofies' detector.

To get a Malaysian work visa in 1996, I had to submit proof that I had never visited the Jewish State: Malaysia urges countries to cut off ties with Israel.

Dresden and Beirut

"Better Beirut become another Dresden, then the light of Western civilization be extinguished," argues Jonathan Ariel in The lesson of Dresden, illustrating that he has not learned anything from that war crime from the last century.

Mr. Ariel is wrong, dead wrong, on many many counts. First, Western Civilization is not at stake in Israel's war on Lebanon. Although Mr. Ariel is correct that "its foundations were respectively laid on the Judean mountains, the Greek islands and the mouth of the Tiber," frankly Western Civilization survived, even thrived, for many centuries before the creation of the State of Israel. Second, even if it were at stake, it would be better for Western Civilization to perish than for it to survive by the indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, for the ends can not justify the means. In fact, Western Civilization would revert to Western Barbarism if it resorted to such slaughter for its survival. Third, the Allied bombing Dresden, while indeed an unjustifiable war crime, was aimed to bring a state to its knees. Israel is not fighting a state, or so it claims, but a terrorist army. Will the collapse of Lebanon eliminate Hezbollah?

Catholic Nagasaki Remembers

From Japan marks atomic bombings on Yahoo! News Photos:

A throng of Catholic nuns and citizens march with torches, marking the 61st anniversary of the atomic bombing near Peace Memorial Park in Nagasaki, southwestern Japan Wednesday, Aug. 9, 2006. Some 2,500 took part in the march. (AP Photo/Kyodo News)


Catholics pray for atomic bomb victims in Nagazaki during a morning mass at the Urakami Cathedral, in Nagasaki city, western island of Kyushu. The Japanese city of Nagasaki has mourned the 61st anniversary of the world's second and last nuclear attack, with its mayor voicing anger that non-proliferation efforts were "collapsing."(AFP/JIJI PRESS)

[See also Nagasaki: 61 years after the bomb and Nagasaki Marks 61 Years Since Bombing.]

Ora Pro Nobis Peccatoribus...

The Madonna of Nagasaki

[image from LCWR Commemorates 60th Anniversary of Atomic Bombings in Japan]

Two A-Bomb Museums

In 2002, my wife and visited an American friend living in the very pleasant and livable City of Kure in Hiroshima Prefecture. Before our visit to the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, my friend told me about an encounter he had had with an American Mormon living in that town.

"Have you been to the A-Bomb Museum?" asked the Mormon to my friend.

"Yes."

"B*llsh*t, isn't it?"

My friend could only scoff.

Before our visit to the museum I steeled myself. Two years earlier, I had visited the The Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum and was shaken by the experience. I did not want to lose my composure in front of my wife and friend. I need not have worried; while I would not use the same adjective to describe the museum as that Mormon had, the experience left me unmoved.

In the Hiroshima museum, no context to the bombings was given. It was as if the bomb had just fallen out of the sky for no reason. While the museum had some horrific artifacts and photographs, the overall message was, as the museum's name suggests, "Give Peace a Chance," or worse yet, "Imagine." It might as well have housed a diarama of John and Yoko's Bed-In For Peace. [If your museum is going to have a message, at least be clear, like Vietnam's War Remnants Museum, which was still known as the "Museum of American War Crimes" when I visited it in 1997.]

Even the city's World Peace Memorial Cathedral seemed less than Catholic. [There may have been a crucifix somewhere, but I only recall seeing the massive modernistic mosaic of the Risen Christ donated by Konrad Adenauer.]

In contrast, Nagasaki's museum was a descent into Hell. A subterranean entrance leads through beams of twisted steel and grotesque mannequins. The context of Japanese militarism and ill-treatment of Koreans in fully explored. [Ten-thousand Koreans died in the blasts; perhaps an equal number were massacred in the days after the 1923 Kanto earthquake.] This museum, in my book, ranks up there with what many consider the world's greatest museum, the Museo Nacional de Antropología in Mexico City, which I visited in 1991.

If the message of the Hiroshima museum is "Make Love Not War," Nagasaki's is "Man's Inhumanity Toward Man." The museum offers no answers, "Just the facts ma'am." It doesn't preach as does its sister museum in Hiroshima. It might be seen as nihilistic. Yet, on leaving the museum, answers can be found in that very Catholic city, which gave us the witness of the Nagasaki Martyrs of 1597.

"My God, what have we done?"

So thought Catholic Air Force Chaplain Father George Zabelka after hearing a description of the human suffering unleashed by the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. Only days earlier, he had blessed the crews who dropped the atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

His testimony unfortunately endorses pacificism, but is nonetheless quite thought-provoking: Blessing the Bombs: The Hiroshima Bombers' Chaplain Faces Christ. Here is an excerpt on the unhappy annivesary we remember today:

The bombing of Nagasaki means even more to me than the bombing of Hiroshima. By August 9, 1945, we knew what that bomb would do, but we still dropped it. We knew that agonies and sufferings would ensue, and we also knew—at least our leaders knew—that it was not necessary. The Japanese were already defeated. They were already suing for peace. But we insisted on unconditional surrender, and this is even against the Just War theory. Once the enemy is defeated, once the enemy is not able to hurt you, you must make peace.

As a Catholic chaplain I watched as the Boxcar, piloted by a good Irish Catholic pilot, dropped the bomb on Urakami Cathedral in Nagasaki, the center of Catholicism in Japan. I knew that St. Francis Xavier, centuries before, had brought the Catholic faith to Japan. I knew that schools, churches, and religious orders were annihilated. And yet I said nothing.

Karl Keating on Nagasaki and Hiroshima

"[C]annot be squared with Catholic moral principles:"

Many justify the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima by saying the abrupt end to the war saved as many as a million American lives that would have been lost had Japan been invaded. I don't know where the figure of one million came from. My understanding is that the War Department estimated a maximum of 46,000 casualties in an invasion. That was a worst-case scenario, meaning the likely number of casualties would have been far lower.

Some commentators have argued that no invasion was needed at all, since Japan no longer had an air force or navy and had no domestic source of oil for its industries. A blockade would have resulted in the Japanese war machine and economy grinding to a halt. The war thus could have ended without an invasion, though the end probably would have come long after the summer of 1945.

Be that as it may, what concerns me is the attitude, so prevalent among political conservatives (most of whom are religious conservatives), that there are no limits in defensive warfare: If the other guys started the fight, they deserve whatever they get. In a defensive war it is not a matter of "My country right or wrong" but of "My country can do no wrong," which is an odd thing coming from conservatives who, on domestic matters, can be highly critical of their government's moral failings (as regards abortion or homosexuality, say).

Catholic moral principles are easy to apply to other people, difficult to apply to ourselves. This is as true in public life as in private life. During World War II our enemies did atrocious things on the battlefield, to conquered nations, and even to their own people. Many of these evils we knew about during the war; others came to light only after the cessation of hostilities.

Even those evils we knew about during the war were so prevalent and so gross that, to many, it seemed permissible, for the duration, to lay aside a principle that we insisted be followed by our enemies: The end does not justify the means.

Rephrase that in Catholic terms: To achieve a good, you may not perform a sin. To provide your family financial security, you may not rob a bank. To protect your wife's health, you may not abort the child she is carrying. And to defeat an enemy in war, you may not violate just war principles. But we did--and more than once, sad to say.

The atomic bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, like the fire bombings of Dresden and other German cities, cannot be squared with Catholic moral principles because the bombings deliberately targeted non-combatants. The evil done by our enemies did not exonerate us from the moral law. Their evils did not provide us justification for evils of our own. Being a Christian in peacetime is difficult; it is more difficult, but even more necessary, in wartime.

Fat Man exploded directly above the Catholic cathedral in Nagasaki. The city was the historical center of Catholicism in Japan and contained about a tenth of the entire Catholic population. The cathedral was filled with worshipers who had gathered to pray for a speedy and just end to the war. It is said their prayers included a petition to offer themselves, if God so willed it, in reparation for the evils perpetrated by their country.

[from Catholic Answers: Karl's E-Letter of August 3, 2004]

Part of the Team

I'd like to thank TS for including me on his International Blogger's All-Star Team, as shortstop no less, a position to which I could never aspire in my less-than-stellar Little League days.

Here is what he has to say:

Josue's blog may well be the only place to find pictures of Miss Korea next to a post speculating on the sainthood of Flannery O'Connor. While I seldom see eye-to-eye with this blogger (who is always sharply critical of the U.S.), politics ain't everything.

Indeed, politics ain't everything, and Video meliora, proboque; Deteriora sequor is one of my favorite blogs.

Perhaps I come off as being overly critical of the U.S. at times; it's the contrarian in me. But I love America. I do. I love the "Little America" loved by fellow Upstate New Yorker Bill Kauffman's Reactionary Radicals. I'd even go so far as to say, "No finer country, no finer people," extending to the country the slogan I once saw on a Buffalonian's t-shirt, which had the word "city" instead of "country." But like Gore Vidal, "I hate the American Empire, and I love the Old Republic." And the Empire made by Team Bush and the Empire made by Hollywood and the Porn Belt are one in the same seen by eyes overseas, à la Abu Ghraib.

As far as the other content here, there is, however, another place where one can find pictures of Miss Korea, and many other beautiful Korean ladies, alongside Paleoconservative Catholic thought. That place is The New Beginning.

Wisdom from Holy Mother Russia

Constantine of Memoirs of a Neophyte today links to an article entitled Post-Soviet Lessons for a Post-American Century by Dmitry Orlov and posts this excerpt:

In spite of the architectural ostentation of the Russian Orthodox Church, and the pomp and circumstance of its rituals, its message has always been one of asceticism as the road to salvation. Salvation is for the poor and the humble, because one's rewards are either in this world or the next, not both

This is rather different from Protestantism, the dominant religion in America, which made the dramatic shift to considering wealth as one of God's blessings, ignoring some inconvenient points rather emphatically made by Jesus to the effect that rich people are extremely unlikely to be saved. Conversely, poverty became associated with laziness and vice, robbing poor people of their dignity.

Thus, a Russian is less likely to consider sudden descent into poverty as a fall from God's grace, and economic collapse as God's punishment upon the people, while the religions that dominate America - Protestantism, Judaism, and Islam - all feature temporal success of their followers as a key piece of evidence that God is well-disposed toward them.

What will happen once God's good will toward them is no longer manifest? Chances are, they will become angry and try to find someone other than their own selves to blame, that being one of the central mechanisms of human psychology. We should look forward to unexpectedly wrathful congregations eager to do the work of an unexpectedly wrathful God.

The article is part of the Surviving Peak Oil website.

Die Schönheitskönigin

Miss Korea is the subject of the third most sent photo on Germany's de.news mostmail - Yahoo! Nachrichten today:

[image from Schönheitskönigin - Yahoo! Nachrichten]

A Beautiful House

[From the Korean film 'A Tale of Two Sisters']

In Brief

The Dear Leader: Kim Jong Il's Absence Raises Speculation

Las Malvinas: Falkland Islands dispute heats up

Argumentum ad Nasrallahum

In An open letter to Pat Buchanan, Burt Prelutsky argues that to offer any objection to Israel's war is to insist "that the only thing that’s required to make Israel the jewel of the Middle East is for those five million Jews to disappear."

Oppose Israeli policy (as many Israelis do) and you're labeled a Jew-hater. How similar this is to calling anyone who opposes Affirmative Action a racist.

Undeterred, here is the latest from Patrick J. Buchanan on the "democratic fundamentalism" of the Bush administration: Condi’s New Middle East.

Here is but a taste:

Think back. Had Reagan done to Lebanon, when half a dozen Americans were seized as hostages, what Israel has done, when two soldiers were taken hostage, Democrats would have denounced Reagan as a war criminal. Conservatives would have begged him to ease up.

Yet, almost to a man and woman, our politicians are falling all over one another to express their 100 percent support of what Israel has done to Lebanon. Even Israelis must feel a measure of contempt for this kind of groveling.

Indeed, in Israel, dissent against the blitzkrieg is rising, and the Olmert regime is being challenged and even condemned by courageous Israelis for letting the air force have a free hand to smash Lebanon.

Christian Lebanon

From Sowing the Wind, Editorial in America, The Catholic Weekly Magazine:

Christians, and Catholics in particular, have reason for acute concern, because Lebanon has been the last country in the Middle East where Christians play a significant role in society. The Lebanese experiment in multireligious co-existence, what the Lebanese call “conviviality,” a promising alternative to government by the mullahs, has been dealt a crippling blow. The weakening of Lebanon means fading possibilities not only for Middle Eastern Christianity but also for interreligious coexistence. The days when the Maronites could retreat to Mount Lebanon are past. The current crisis calls for American and other Western Christians to defend Lebanon and its Christians with the strongest expressions of solidarity.

With neoconservative foreign policy leading to the de-Christianization of Iraq and now Lebanon, and with Israel, not America, being its sole beneficiary, the conclusion reached by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, essentially that America is the junior partner in the U.S.-Israeli alliance, is all the more plausible.

Ultramontanism

As both an Alpinist and a Papist, I could not but post this photo from the Holy Father's vacation:

[image from Ort des Rückzugs]

The Saint of Urakami

The Urakami Cathedral, at the time the largest Christian church in Asia, served as the siting target for the A-Bomb dropped on Nagasaki on August 9th, 1945:

Nagasaki was the historic center of Catholicism in Japan, and in a matter of seconds, more Christians were killed than in 400 years of brutal persecution.

One survivor was Takashi Nagai, a medical doctor and convert to Catholicism. Here is his account of August 9th, 1945 from Catholic Saints & Other Christian Heroes - Takashi Nagai:

There was a flash of blinding light. I thought: A bomb has fallen right at the university entrance! I intended to throw myself to the floor immediately, but before I could, window-pane glass rushed in with a frightening noise. A giant hand seemed to grab me and hurl me three meters. Fragments of glass flew about like leaves in a whirlwind. My eyes were open and I had a glimpse of the outside—planks, beams, clothing were doing a weird dance in the air. All the objects in my room had joined in, and I felt the end had come. My right side was cut by glass, and warm blood coursed down my cheek and neck.

The giant invisible fist had gone berserk and was smashing everything in the office. Various objects fell on top of me while I listened to strange noises like mountains rumbling back and forth. Then came pitch darkness as if the ferro-concrete hospital were an express train that had just rushed headlong into a tunnel. . . . Panic gripped my heart when I heard crackling flames and sniffed acrid smoke. I was conscious of my sins, especially the ones I had intended to confess that very afternoon, and directed my whole attention to the Lord our Judge and asked his forgiveness.

From the same source:

A couple of days later, at his first opportunity, an exhausted Nagai walked to the site of his home and found his beloved Midori’s charred bones amidst the wreckage that was once their kitchen. Kneeling beside her, he discovered a melted blob that had been her rosary, lying next to her right hand. Even as he wept, he was filled with gratitude that his wife had died praying.

Nagai worked tirelessly to save the victims of the bombing, but collapsed from the leukemia he had been diagnosed with a few months before the bombing.

Here is a picture of the bed-ridden doctor praying with his children shortly before his death, from Album du 10 octobre: Japon et Chine:

Takashi Nagaï en prière avec ses deux enfants, quelques mois avant sa mort (photo d'archive).

More can be learned about him here: The Man who Loved Others as Himself.

Books, Books, Books

As a bibliophile, I cannot help but take up this Book Meme from The New Crusade:

1. One book that changed your life: The Spirit of Catholicism by Karl Adam

2. One book that you have read more than once: Cien Años de Soledad by Gabriel García Márquez

3. One book you'd want on a desert island: Christian Prayer: The Liturgy of the Hours

4. One book that made you laugh: Devils: The Possessed by Fyodor Dostoevsky

5. One book that made you cry: The Prostitute by Kanha Surangkhanang

6. One book you wish would have been written: 西儒 - The Western Confucian

7. One book you wish had never been written: The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels

8. One book you are currently reading: The Library of Greek Mythology

9. One book you have been meaning to read: El Ingenioso Hidalgo de Don Quijote de la Mancha by Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

10. Tag some others: Anyone reading this

Islamic Monarchs and European Monarchs Descended from Mohammed

Dappled Things today links to the reposting of a compeling 1986 article written by the great Erik Ritter von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (1909–1999) entitled Monarchs and Presidents in Islam, in which is noted the following:

While individual monarchs historically may have been capricious or cruel, monarchy as an institution is inclined to be generous: Montesquieu has told us that while the driving element in republics is virtue, in monarchies it is clemency. And, indeed, the Islamic monarchs of old were infinitely more tolerant than their modern republican successors.

Equally compelling is the claim that all European royals are descendents of the Prophet Mohammed:

[King Hassan II of Morocco] is a descendant of Mohammed's daughter Fatima, as by now are all the Christian royal families. (Many centuries ago, a Moroccan prince was taken prisoner by the Castilians and converted in captivity. After his release he married into a princely family, and over the centuries his bloodline has spread into countless aristocratic and royal families.)

Nossa Senhora de Fátima, pray for the conversion of Muslims.

The Sea of Korea

I swam in it yesterday. I will not enter into the fray as to whether the body of water a few miles to the east of me should be known as the Sea of Korea, the Sea of Japan, the East Sea, the Blue Sea, or any of its other names, but because I love old maps, I offer this image from today's Digital Chosun Ilbo:

A 19th-century American map labeling the body of water between Korea and Japan as the “Sea of Korea.” The map, unveiled by Hannam University on Monday and made in Connecticut around 1829, was a gift from the Georgia Institute of Technology./Yonhap

[image and text from Front - August. 8, 2006]

In Brief

"[F]ighting terrorism by practicing 'state terrorism'": Massacre in Houla as Arab countries discuss UN draft

Some local news: Workers' rallies in southern city reach breaking point: Rallies in Pohang increasing in number and violence

The anti-Christian Libertine Union: ACLU Raises Objections Over Cross-Shaped Katrina Memorial

How utterly surprising: Sexual lyrics prompt teens to have sex

靖國神社: Japan shrine debate grows before WWII anniversary

Abeer Qasim Hamza al-Janabi: Court told US troops gang-raped Iraqi girl

Spengler's Bad Advice

Asia Times Online's Spengler is one of the more interesting, entertaining, informative, but ultimately misguided commentators on the Internet, as witnessed in this humorous but misinformed article in which he poses as an advice columnist answering letters from Mel Gibson, Pope Benedict XVI, President Bush, and Prime Minister Olmert: Weep, drink and be Melly.

Here is the "question" from the Holy Father and the beginning of Spengler's answer:

Dear Spengler:
As chief executive of the world's largest Christian denomination, I plead for an immediate stop to the killing in the Middle East. I am surprised that American evangelical Christians seem less concerned about peace than about victory, and appear to be more pro-Israeli than the Israelis themselves. I can understand how Christians can support their own country in time of war, although the consequences may be tragic. But American Christians have no direct stake in this fight. How is it that the evangelicals and I come to such radically different conclusions?
Tired on the Tiber

Dear Tired:
You have already half-answered the question. During World War I, Benedict XV tried to persuade the combatants to stop, and rightly so. Russia considered itself the only true God-bearing nation (Fyodor Dostoyevsky's phrase) and the seat of the Third Rome after the fall of Constantinople; Austria the rump of the Holy Roman Empire and thus the arbiter of Christian Europe; France fought for its national grandeur, pursuing the delusion institutionalized by Cardinal Richelieu; and Germany mistook Siegfried for Christ, in Franz Rosenzweig's phrase. They were idolaters all of them, worshipping their own image in place of that of the crucified Christ. The next time they fought, in 1939, Germany and Russia marched under pagan banners and France did not fight at all. That is why Christianity is dead in Europe and why your great cathedrals are full of tourists and empty of congregants.

American evangelicals have no cathedrals, no Magisterium, no pontifical universities, no monastic orders with institutional memories back to the 4th century. They have mega-churches in shopping malls, mass commercial culture, and Christ crucified. Americans evaded Europe's tragedy because they rejected the idolatry that you and your predecessors, including the great Benedict XV, failed to control. Their forbears came to America to be Israel. They do not have the staff of St Peter upon which to lean, only their own wobbly legs to ascend the road to Calvary.

What binds American Christians to Israel is that the inner journey of each Christian, in his conversion from Gentile to child of Abraham, recapitulates the story of Israel, just as Jesus' own story recapitulates the entire story of Israel's redemption. American evangelicals are not baptized and raised as Christians; they must become Christians at the age of sentience. But to become a Christian is to undertake Israel's journey. You consider your Church to be Israel; evangelicals are children of Abraham by adoption, which is not to say that they are less loved by their foster father than the children of his flesh. But because they love their adoptive father, they love his natural children all the more.

In the first paragraph, Spengler fails to mention the Evangelical Wilson's crusade to bring the false American god of Democracy to Europe as a, if not the, cause of the Second World War.

The second paragraph suggests that American Evangelicals are not idolatrous, while saying that America's "forbears came to America to be Israel" is nothing short of American messianism. And browsing the books, CD's, and bumperstickers at any Evangelical gift shop indicates that the movement is largely about self-idolatry. Having seen American Evangelical missionary activity abroad in Chile, Malaysia, and South Korea, where I have lived, I can say that American cultural assumptions (permed hair, bad music, crass consumerism, the prosperity anti-gospel, etc.) are part and parcel of the message spread with the message of Christ crucified, unlike the inculturation one sees among Catholics, in which the universal and particular and seemlessly united.

The third paragraph reduces Baptism to a mere initiation ritual, not a Sacrament that acts ex opere operato; thus, it becomes a work of Man not of God. This also suggests that there were no real Christians until the Anabaptists came along in the 16th Century. And, in his defense of Christian Zionism, Spengler rejects the fact that Judaism is, in the words of my friend Jeff Culbreath of Hallowed Ground, "the only religion in the world founded on an explicit rejection of the Son of God."

The same mistaken Christian Zionist and Radical Individualist assumptions from the third paragraph are continued in the last:

The evangelicals convert themselves to Christianity every day, which is the same as saying that for them Christianity is not a doctrine but a life. The living history of Israel and the story of its redemption did not end with the Resurrection, but continues on the Lebanese border. Evangelical Christianity brings the god who revealed himself in history into the hearts of men, to which Christians respond by making the revelation in history the journey of their own soul.

So, Christianity is not a religion (from Latin re and ligere, meaning "to bind again") but a life-style choice and there is no call for Jews to convert, both of which are very American assumptions that could have been uttered by Oprah herself.

The A-Bomb

A conservative blog for peace today links to this post from the Catholic Neocon Observer about how the events sixty-one years ago redefined what it meant to be conservative: Nuking Japan: The Development of Conservative Dogma.

And LewRockwell.com offers an essay on the destruction of Catholic Nagasaki, and the martyrdoms of Franz Jaegerstaetter and Sister Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, all at the hands of professed Christians on The Ninth of August.

In Brief

Alone in the crowd: Isolated Americans trying to connect

Orwell's "memory hole": Half of U.S. still believes Iraq had WMD

Abeer Qassim al-Janabi: Medic details finding Iraqi girl's body

Trouble in the seas: Scientists: Warming triggers 'dead zone'

On torture: 'Hard to tell Christians from lions’

A six-page story: Billy Graham's New Thinking on Politics, the Bible

The Dear Leader: Kim Jong Il Vanishes From Public Eye

Catholic Prayers for Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah

Is this what the Israeli aggresion hath wrought?

Pray for the resistance, pray for Hassan Nasrallah. He is defending justice.

-- Father Elias Zahlawi, to the faithful gathered below:

Syrian Christians pray at a special mass held to support Lebanon at the Lady of Damascus Catholic Church late night August 3, 2006. REUTERS/Khaled al-Hariri

[image and text from Syria's Christians rally behind Hizbollah]

One hopes, as I suspect, that Father Zahlawi's comments only reflect those of one Catholic priest, a man, who like the rest of us, is fallible and suspect to letting emotion cloud reason, and that this is another instance of the media's selecting off-the-cuff remarks of one individual Catholic priest or bishop and lending to them the air of ex cathedra importance.

Should we pray for Lebanon? Yes. We should fast as well. Should we pray for Nasrallah? Yes. We should pray for his conversion, and that of the Saracens and Jews and both sides of this conflict.

Distributivism

Distributivism is a political philosphy that hold that "[t]he means of production should be distributed as widely as possible among the populace; they should neither be hoarded by a oligarchy, nor controlled by the government."

The Distributist Review is a blog that is doing a fine job in promoting the philosophy. It has had some fine posts as of late. Below, I link to but two of them.

First, Cautionary Tales About Ford and Mao shows us two directions not to take, as Roy F. Moore explains how "[w]hether by big business (Ford) or big government (Mao), the schemes of the powerful can have dreadful consequences for the innocent and the helpless." I'm reminded of how the Fordist and Marxist ways of thinking converge in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.

Second, we are given an example of the direction that should be taken as Uruguay Advances Toward Distributism. Included is a link to this site with plenty of material to digest for hispanohablantes: Cooperativismo y Autogestión.

Co-ops. My second full-time job, after working a summer on a farm, was at the The Lexington Real Foods Community Co-op, about fifteen years before I had even heard of Distributivism.

In Brief

Mahmoudiya: Hearing begins in Iraq rape-slaying case

Just a rock: After 10 years, few believe life on Mars

Hiroshima

The atomic bombings were "the most powerful blow ever delivered against Christian civilization and the moral law" according to comtemporary Father James Gillis, editor of The Catholic World and stalwart of the Old Right, quoted by Ralph Raico in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

William Luse reminds us that "[t]he anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima falls this year on the Feast of the Transfiguration of Our Lord; and of Nagasaki on the day honoring Sr. Teresa Benedicta of the Cross (Edith Stein)" in a post entitled Sunday Thought: That Kingdom Coming Business, which includes a must-read poem by James C. McCullagh on the bombings.

Proud to Be an American

Father Jim Tucker of Dappled Things today links to this 2003 essay by fellow Upstate New Yorker Bill Kauffman, of Reactionary Radicals fame:

Why I'm Not Ashamed to be an American
My America vs. the Empire

Here's a taste:

There are two Americas: the televised America, known and hated by the world, and the rest of us. The former is a factitious creation whose strange gods include "Sex and the City," accentless TV anchorpeople, Dick Cheney, Rosie O'Donnell, "Friends," and the Department of Homeland Security. It is real enough--cross it and you'll learn more than you want to know about weapons of mass destruction--but it has no heart, no soul, no connection to the thousand and one real Americas that produced Zora Neale Hurston and Jack Kerouac and Saint Dorothy Day and the Mighty Casey who has struck out.

I am of the other America, the unseen America, the America undreamt of by the foreigners who hate my country without knowing a single thing about it. Ours is a land of volunteer fire departments, of baseball, of wizened spinsters who instead of sitting around whining about their goddamned osteoporosis write and self-publish books on the histories of their little towns, of the farmwives and grain merchants and parsons and drunkards who made their places live

Living overseas, I have to sadly admit that no one is aware of the existence of the "Little America" Mr. Kauffman writes about.